Michael Clark v. Frederick Entzel
| MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK |
| FREDERICK ENTZEL |
| 22-1849 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Michael Anthony Clark. [7] [7246657] [22-1849] (CAG) [Entered: 07/07/2022 02:29 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant Michael Clark shall have thirty days from the date at the top of this order to file a memorandum explaining why this court should not summarily affirm the district court's decision. Briefing in this case is otherwise SUSPENDED pending further order of the court. MPB [6] [7241021] [22-1849] (MM) [Entered: 06/07/2022 02:31 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Michael Anthony Clark. (Originally included in docket entry #4) [5] [7239126] [22-1849] (PS) [Entered: 05/27/2022 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael Anthony Clark. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 20-1144 [4] [7239048] [22-1849] (CAG) [Entered: 05/27/2022 01:07 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re: Motion. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall file the Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by June 9, 2022. The clerk will send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. Briefing will proceed as follows: [ # 2 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 07/12/2022 for Michael Anthony Clark. Appellee's brief due on or before 08/11/2022 for Frederick Entzel. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 09/01/2022 for Appellant Michael Anthony Clark. The clerk will also send the appellant this courts brief information sheet for pro se litigants so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the court's expectations for briefs. [ # 2 ] CMD [3] [7238667] [22-1849] (HTP) [Entered: 05/26/2022 09:17 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael Anthony Clark to extend time to file appellant's brief and to extend time to file the docketing statement [2] [7238485] [22-1849] (CAG) [Entered: 05/25/2022 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP. Transcript information sheet due by 05/27/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Anthony Clark by 05/20/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/22/2022 for Michael Anthony Clark. [1] [7236329] [22-1849] (FP) [Entered: 05/16/2022 12:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Clark v. Frederick Entzel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK | |
| Represented By: | Michael Anthony Clark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: FREDERICK ENTZEL | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Virginia Boyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
