City of La Crosse v. Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC, et al
| CITY OF LA CROSSE |
| FAIRWAY OUTDOOR FUNDING, LLC, doing business as LAMAR ADVERTISING OF LA CROSSE, trade name THE LAMAR COMPANIES |
| WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and CRAIG THOMPSON |
| 22-1853 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER re: Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal. [ # 10 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [12][7240154] [22-1853] (PS) [Entered: 06/02/2022 02:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Response to May 31, 2022 order to show cause. [ # 9 ] The Rule to Show Cause, which issued on May 31, 2022, is DISCHARGED. DW [11] [7240147] [22-1853] (PS) [Entered: 06/02/2022 02:06 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 06/02/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7240162-2] [7240162] [22-1853] (PS) [Entered: 06/02/2022 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 Motion filed by Appellant Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC to dismiss case. [10] [7239856] [22-1853] (Diedrich, Joseph) [Entered: 06/01/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Showcause Response by Appellant Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC Attorney Joseph S. Diedrich to Court's May 31, 2022, Order to Show Cause. [9][7239854] [22-1853] (Diedrich, Joseph) [Entered: 06/01/2022 02:22 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders attorney Joseph S. Diedrich to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of May 17, 2022. That order required counsel to address whether the district court specified the relief to which plaintiff City of LaCrosse is entitled, as the victorious party in this litigation. Counsel has not done so. Either the district court awarded relief to plaintiff City of LaCrosse, or it did not. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED Attorney Joseph S. Diedrich file his response on or before June 6, 2022. Counsel is advised that failure to respond may result in monetary or disciplinary sanctions. DW [8] [7239379] [22-1853] (AP) [Entered: 05/31/2022 12:35 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC. [7] [7238951] [22-1853] (Diedrich, Joseph) [Entered: 05/27/2022 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 6 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC. [6] [7238950] [22-1853] (Diedrich, Joseph) [Entered: 05/27/2022 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joseph S. Diedrich for Appellant Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC. [5] [7238948] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1853] (Diedrich, Joseph) [Entered: 05/27/2022 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Certificate of Service to City of La Crosse's Appearance & Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement filed on 05/20/2022 by Appellee City of La Crosse. [4] [7237565] [22-1853] (Bayer, Nathan) [Entered: 05/20/2022 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Nathan J. Bayer for Appellee City of La Crosse. [3] [7237563] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1853] (Bayer, Nathan) [Entered: 05/20/2022 10:00 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Defendant-appellant shall file, on or before 05/31/2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). DW [7236671] [2] [7236671] [22-1853] (MM) [Entered: 05/17/2022 12:06 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 05/31/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/27/2022 for Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC. [1] [7236494] [22-1853] (CG) [Entered: 05/16/2022 03:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: City of La Crosse v. Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: CITY OF LA CROSSE | |
| Represented By: | Nathan J. Bayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: FAIRWAY OUTDOOR FUNDING, LLC, doing business as LAMAR ADVERTISING OF LA CROSSE, trade name THE LAMAR COMPANIES | |
| Represented By: | Joseph S. Diedrich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION | |
| Represented By: | Peter S. Rank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CRAIG THOMPSON | |
| Represented By: | Peter S. Rank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
