Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Lewis Produce Market No. 2
Plaintiff / Appellee: PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant: LEWIS PRODUCE MARKET NO. 2
Case Number: 22-1863
Filed: May 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: This appeal is voluntarily DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Each side shall bear its own costs. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 11 ] [ # 13 ][14][7247603] [22-1863] (HTP) [Entered: 07/12/2022 10:57 AM]
July 12, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/12/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7247613-2] [7247613] [22-1863] (HTP) [Entered: 07/12/2022 11:08 AM]
July 7, 2022 Filing 13 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellee Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company Attorney David Grassmick to Lewis Produce Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal. [13][7246628] [22-1863] (Grassmick, David) [Entered: 07/07/2022 01:26 PM]
June 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re: Defendant-appellant Lewis Produce Market No. 2 Inc.s motion for voluntary dismissal of appeal pursuant to Fed R. App. P. 42(b). [ # 11 ] The appellee shall file a response to the motion on or before July 7, 2022. CMD [12] [7245389] [22-1863] (PS) [Entered: 06/30/2022 11:07 AM]
June 28, 2022 Filing 11 Motion filed by Appellant Lewis Produce Market No. 2 to dismiss case. [11] [7244905] [22-1863] (Mikuzis, Steven) [Entered: 06/28/2022 09:51 AM]
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: This appeal is REMANDED to the district court to enter a judgment that fully and completely implements its decision, declaring specifically and separately the respective rights of the parties. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a); Fed. R. App. P. 12.1. Once the district court has done so, this appeal will proceed to briefing. An amended notice of appeal is unnecessary; the original appeal will come into force once a proper judgment has been entered. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(2); cf. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co. v. The Chicago Trust Co., 930 F.3d 910, 912 (7th Cir. 2019). Further, appellant shall inform the court, no later than July 8, 2022, whether the district court has entered its amended judgment. DW [10] [7244207] [22-1863] (AD) [Entered: 06/23/2022 03:02 PM]
June 23, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 06/23/2022 Limited Remand Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7244209-2] [7244209] [22-1863] (AD) [Entered: 06/23/2022 03:06 PM]
June 6, 2022 Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Steven P. Mikuzis for Appellant Lewis Produce Market No. 2. [9] [7240750] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1863] (Mikuzis, Steven) [Entered: 06/06/2022 03:31 PM]
May 31, 2022 Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company. [8] [7239427] [22-1863] (Grassmick, David) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:07 PM]
May 31, 2022 Filing 7 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Lewis Produce Market No. 2. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7239318] [22-1863] (Mikuzis, Steven) [Entered: 05/31/2022 10:45 AM]
May 31, 2022 Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellant Lewis Produce Market No. 2 For leave to file rule 60a motion before District Court to correct Rule 58 judgment order.. [6] [7239312] [22-1863] (Mikuzis, Steven) [Entered: 05/31/2022 10:39 AM]
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: A review of the Amended Docketing Statement filed by appellant on May 24, 2022, reveals that the statement remains inadequate. Heres why. The citizenship of a corporation is that of its state of incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. 1332(c)(1). Appellant has not explicitly identified the state where the defendant corporations have their principal place of business. Appellant must do so. Accordingly, appellant shall file, on or before June 1, 2022, a complete docketing statement that includes the omitted information noted above. DW [5] [7238440] [22-1863] (PS) [Entered: 05/25/2022 12:16 PM]
May 24, 2022 Filing 4 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Lewis Produce Market No. 2. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7238304] [22-1863] (Mikuzis, Steven) [Entered: 05/24/2022 05:59 PM]
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Defendant-appellant Lewis Produce Market No. 2 shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before May 24, 2022. (See order for further details) DW [3] [3] [7236807] [22-1863] (PS) [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:49 PM]
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant and appellee shall file, on or before June 1, 2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, or sent back to the district court as was done in the Philadelphia Indemnity and Greenhill cases for entry of a proper judgment. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [7236806][2] [7236806] [22-1863] (PS) [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:46 PM]
May 17, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 05/31/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 06/27/2022 for Lewis Produce Market No. 2. [1] [7236669] [22-1863] (CG) [Entered: 05/17/2022 12:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Lewis Produce Market No. 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: David E. Grassmick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: LEWIS PRODUCE MARKET NO. 2
Represented By: Steven Mikuzis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?