Daryl Brown v. Michelle Briggs
| DARYL A. BROWN |
| MICHELLE BRIGGS, Director of RWI Treatment |
| 22-1963 |
| May 31, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Letter, filed on July 28, 2022. In light of the briefing order dated 07/19/2022, appellants letter will be filed without court action. JPK [8] [7251238] [22-1963] (MM) [Entered: 07/28/2022 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed letter from Appellant Daryl A. Brown regarding fee status. [7] [7251164] [22-1963] (MAN) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:24 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The District Court GRANTED the appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and the initial partial filing fee has been waived. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/18/2022 for Daryl A. Brown. Appellee's brief due on or before 09/19/2022 for Michelle Briggs. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/11/2022 for Appellant Daryl A. Brown [6] [7249051] [22-1963] (CAG) [Entered: 07/19/2022 09:57 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Daryl A. Brown leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 07/13/2022. The initial partial filing fee has been WAIVED. [5] [7248174] [22-1963] (CAG) [Entered: 07/14/2022 08:31 AM] |
| Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7245915] [22-1963] (CAG) [Entered: 07/05/2022 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Daryl A. Brown. Prior or Related proceedings: No. (Forwarded from district court) [3] [7245425] [22-1963] (MAN) [Entered: 06/30/2022 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellee Michelle Briggs. [2] [7241212] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-1963]--[Edited 06/08/2022 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 06/08/2022 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Daryl A. Brown by 06/03/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/30/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 06/14/2022. [1] [7239779] [22-1963] (CG) [Entered: 06/01/2022 11:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Daryl Brown v. Michelle Briggs | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DARYL A. BROWN | |
| Represented By: | Daryl A. Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MICHELLE BRIGGS, Director of RWI Treatment | |
| Represented By: | Heather Terese Gilbert |
| Represented By: | Julie Ann Teuscher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
