Aaron Scurlock v. Tiffanie Clark
Petitioner / Appellant: AARON SCURLOCK
Respondent / Appellee: TIFFANIE CLARK, Day-to-Day Warden
Case Number: 22-2080
Filed: June 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Scurlocks request for a certificate of appealability, his requests for counsel, and all other pending motions are DENIED. (See order for further details) Diane S. Sykes, Chief Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [10] [7254400] [22-2080] (PS) [Entered: 08/12/2022 02:01 PM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 9 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Aaron Scurlock. [9] [7246057] [22-2080] (MAN) [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:44 PM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Aaron Scurlock for certificate of appealability. [8] [7246038] [22-2080] (MAN) [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:26 PM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Aaron Scurlock to merge premature appeals into current appeal case. [7] [7246037] [22-2080] (MAN) [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:25 PM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Aaron Scurlock for appointment of counsel. [6] [7246036] [22-2080] (MAN) [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:24 PM]
June 28, 2022 Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Aaron Scurlock leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 06/21/2022. Request for certificate of appealability [163] is denied. See 4/27/2022 memorandum opinion and order [157].Motion for attorney representation [164] is denied without prejudice [5] [7244876] [22-2080] (AP) [Entered: 06/28/2022 09:01 AM]
June 24, 2022 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Tiffanie Clark. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. Scurlock v. Brookhart, No. 20-2937, and Scurlock v. Brookhart, No. 21-1329 [4] [7244304] [22-2080] (Schneider, Joshua) [Entered: 06/24/2022 08:12 AM]
June 22, 2022 Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Aaron Scurlock for appointment of counsel. [3] [7243931] [22-2080] (LCP) [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:45 PM]
June 22, 2022 Filing 2 Appearance form filed by Attorney Joshua M. Schneider for Appellee Tiffanie Clark. [2] [7243733] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-2080] [2] [7243733] [22-2080]--[Edited 06/22/2022 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Schneider, Joshua) [Entered: 06/22/2022 08:52 AM]
June 17, 2022 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 04/27/2022. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 07/01/2022. [1] [7243565] [22-2080] (MM) [Entered: 06/21/2022 02:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Aaron Scurlock v. Tiffanie Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: AARON SCURLOCK
Represented By: Aaron Scurlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: TIFFANIE CLARK, Day-to-Day Warden
Represented By: Joshua M. Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?