Teddy Driver v. Ty Solomon, et al
| TEDDY H. DRIVER |
| TY SOLOMON, Kokomo Police Officer #372, TRAVIS WILLIAMS, Kokomo Police Officer #387, CODY RAYLS, Kokomo Police Officer, a.k.a. OFFICER CODY RAYLES, CITY OF KOKOMO, Indiana, JORDAN CARPENTER, Howard County Correctional Officer and HOWARD COUNTY, INDIANA |
| 22-2151 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Teddy H. Driver leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/22/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/21/2022 for Appellant Teddy H. Driver [7255956] [14] [7255956] [22-2151] (CG) [Entered: 08/22/2022 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 13 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [13] [7253459] [22-2151] (AD) [Entered: 08/09/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Teddy H. Driver to dismiss defendant's motion to dismiss. [12] [7250634] [22-2151] (LCP) [Entered: 07/26/2022 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Teddy H. Driver objecting to defense counsels reply of questions jurisdiction and request to dismiss. [11] [7250379] [22-2151] (CAG) [Entered: 07/25/2022 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Teddy H. Driver. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-1866 [10] [7250329] [22-2151] (LCP) [Entered: 07/25/2022 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/05/2022 for Appellant Teddy H. Driver. [9] [7249914] [22-2151] (AD) [Entered: 07/22/2022 08:59 AM] |
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellees Ty Solomon, Travis Williams, Cody Rayls, Jordan Carpenter, Howard County, Indiana and City of Kokomo. [8] [7249366] [22-2151] (Witte, Daniel) [Entered: 07/20/2022 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 Motion filed by Appellee Jordan Carpenter in 22-1866, Appellees Howard County, Indiana, City of Kokomo, Cody Rayls, Ty Solomon and Travis Williams in 22-2151 to dismiss case. [7] [7248456] [22-1866, 22-2151] (Witte, Daniel) [Entered: 07/15/2022 10:25 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant Teddy H. Driver is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Teddy H. Driver by 07/28/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 5641. [6] [7248180] [22-2151] (AD) [Entered: 07/14/2022 08:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: On consideration of the Memorandum filed by appellant on 07/11/2022, appellees shall file, on or before 07/20/2022, a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of 07/01/2022. DW [5] [7247486] [22-2151] (MM) [Entered: 07/11/2022 04:48 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Teddy H. Driver. [4] [7247376] [22-2151] (CAG) [Entered: 07/11/2022 02:52 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a notice of appeal in a civil case be filed in the district court within 30 days of the entry of the judgment or order appealed. In this case judgment was entered on April 26, 2022, and the notice of appeal was filed on June 29, 2022, over one month late. The district court has not granted an extension of the appeal period, see Rule 4(a), and this court is not empowered to do so, see Fed. R. App. P. 26(b). This appeal also appears unnecessary if all that appellant Teddy H. Driver seeks to appeal is the judgment. He filed an appeal on May 13, 2022, see Appeal No. 22-1866, and that appeal proceeds. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellant, on or before July 15, 2022, file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7245782] DW[3] [7245782] [22-2151] (AP) [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:04 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). DW [7245776] [2] [7245776] [22-2151] (AP) [Entered: 07/01/2022 02:59 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 07/14/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Teddy H. Driver by 07/06/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/14/2022 for Appellant Teddy H. Driver. [1] [7245660] [22-2151] (FP) [Entered: 07/01/2022 11:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
