Henry Brown v. USA
HENRY R. BROWN |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
22-2153 |
June 30, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b) and 3(c). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [6] [7256126] [22-2153] (AD) [Entered: 08/23/2022 09:51 AM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/23/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7256134-2] [7256134] [22-2153] (AD) [Entered: 08/23/2022 10:05 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders petitioner-appellant Henry Brown to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of July 5, 2022. Petitioner-appellant Henry Brown shall file his response on or before August 15, 2022. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of July 5, 2022, to appellants copy of this order. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 5290. DW [5] [7251757] [22-2153] (PS) [Entered: 08/01/2022 04:25 PM] |
Filing 4 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/05/2022 for Appellant Henry R. Brown. [4] [7249918] [22-2153] (AD) [Entered: 07/22/2022 09:04 AM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Henry R. Brown is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Henry R. Brown by 07/28/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 5665. [3] [7248189] [22-2153] (AD) [Entered: 07/14/2022 09:12 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Henry R. Brown, on or before July 19, 2022, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to a review of the order entered on May 3, 2022, denying appellant Harry R. Browns Motion for Reconsideration. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). [7246064] DW [2] [7246064] [22-2153] (HTP) [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:48 PM] |
Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 03/17/2022. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Henry R. Brown by 07/07/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 07/14/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/14/2022 for Appellant Henry R. Brown. [1] [7245758] [22-2153] (PS) [Entered: 07/01/2022 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Henry Brown v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: HENRY R. BROWN | |
Represented By: | Henry R. Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Jonathan H. Koenig |
Represented By: | Rebecca Taibleson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.