Kimberly Howell v. Manitowoc County Human Services, et al
| KIMBERLY HOWELL |
| MANITOWOC COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF MANITOWOC, WISCONSIN, STEPHANIE WILLIS, BRIANNA ZIPPERER, DAVE MCCUE, Detective and PETER CONRAD |
| 22-2184 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Kimberly Howell v. Manitowoc County Human Services |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Lucas C. Logic for Appellees Manitowoc County Human Services, Stephanie Willis, Brianna Zipperer and Peter Conrad. Additional Parties: Manitowoc County. [9] [7254297] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2184] (Logic, Lucas) [Entered: 08/12/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Lucas C. Logic for Appellees Manitowoc County Human Services, Stephanie Willis, Brianna Zipperer and Peter Conrad has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7253231] [22-2184] (LJ) [Entered: 08/08/2022 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Remzy D. Bitar for Appellees Manitowoc County Human Services, Stephanie Willis, Brianna Zipperer and Peter Conrad. Additional Parties: Manitowoc County. [7] [7251811] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2184] [7] [7251811] [22-2184]--[Edited 08/02/2022 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Bitar, Remzy) [Entered: 08/02/2022 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kimberly Howell to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (USB flash drive tendered with original document) [6] [7251702] [22-2184] (MAN) [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kimberly Howell to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7248905] [22-2184] (CAG) [Entered: 07/18/2022 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Kimberly Howell leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/11/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/10/2022 for Appellant Kimberly Howell [7247357] [4] [7247357] [22-2184] (AP) [Entered: 07/11/2022 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 No attorney(s) added for Appellee Dave McCue, Judge Mark Roherer, City of Manitowoc, per District Court docket and information sheet. [3] [7246719] [22-2184] (FP) [Entered: 07/07/2022 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Manitowoc County; Judge Mark Roherer; [2] [7246716] [22-2184] (FP) [Entered: 07/07/2022 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 07/20/2022. Docketing Statement filed. due for Appellant Kimberly Howell by 07/13/2022. [1] [7246671] [22-2184]--[Edited 07/08/2022 by FP to reflect that the docketing statement is part of the short record. ] (FP) [Entered: 07/07/2022 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
