Firas Ayoubi v. U.S. Bank N.A., et al
| FIRAS M. AYOUBI |
| U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, WALMART INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY and VERIZON WIRELESS |
| 22-2216 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Lucas Sun for Appellee Walmart Inc.. [18] [7259608] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2216] [Edited 09/09/2022 by CG to reflect the addition of cousel.] (Sun, Lucas) [Entered: 09/09/2022 02:51 PM] |
Filing 17
ORDER: Filed clerk's notice to Appellees USA and Walmart Inc. to file a response to JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM. Response due for Appellees United States of America and Walmart Inc. by 09/14/2022, addressing the jurisdictional issues raised in the court's order of 8/16/22. DW [17] [7259278] [22-2216] (ER) [Entered: 09/08/2022 12:03 PM]
|
| Filing 16 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Firas M. Ayoubi. [16] [7258198] [22-2216] (MAN) [Entered: 09/01/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 15 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee USA. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [15] [7258098] [22-2216] (Ling, Ernest) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 14 Appearance form filed by Attorney Ernest Y. Ling for Appellee USA. [14] [7258097] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2216] (Ling, Ernest) [Entered: 09/01/2022 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Notice that the $505 filing fee has been paid in full by Appellant Firas M. Ayoubi. [13] [7255925] [22-2216] (CAG) [Entered: 08/22/2022 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 12 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Firas M. Ayoubi. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [12] [7255405] [22-2216] (KRA) [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:00 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The appellant, on or before August 30, 2022, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to a review of the order entered on June 23, 2022, denying appellant Ayoubis motion to reconsider. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details.) [7254977] DW [11] [7254977] [22-2216] (CG) [Entered: 08/16/2022 03:50 PM]
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney James P. Balog for Appellee Walmart Inc. has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [10] [7254931] [22-2216] (LJ) [Entered: 08/16/2022 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed notice from the District Court that the $505.00 appellate fee was received. [9][7253327] [22-2216] (SK) [Entered: 08/08/2022 04:43 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time to pay appeal fee, filed on 7/28/2022. In light of the courts order dated July 28, 2022, the motion for extension of time will be filed without further court action. [8] [7251284] JPK [22-2216] (FP) [Entered: 07/28/2022 05:01 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Firas M. Ayoubi for extension of time to file pay the appeal fee. [7] [7251162] [22-2216] (MAN) [Entered: 07/28/2022 02:23 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Appellant's motion for extension of time to pay appellate filing and docketing fees. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of the district court by August 29, 2022. [ # 5 ] [6] [7251047] SCR [22-2216] (HTP) [Entered: 07/28/2022 08:14 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Firas M. Ayoubi to extend time to pay appellate filing and docketing fees. [5] [7250923] [22-2216] (LCP) [Entered: 07/27/2022 02:43 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings in this appeal are SUSPENDED pending assessment and payment of any necessary fees. Notice issued, pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b), to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the Appellate court or pay the $505 docketing fee in the district court. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 08/04/2022. [4] [7249788] [22-2216] (CMD) [Entered: 07/21/2022 02:26 PM]
|
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Syncrony Bank N.A., Harlem Motors Inc., 700 Credit Co, PNC Bank, Mercedes Aldridge, Louay Ihmud, Mojahed Ihmud, Bernard Smuda, Unknown co-conspirator, Unknown Wal-Mart employee, Unknown Syncrony Bank employee and Unknown PNC Bank employee. [3] [7248078] [22-2216] (ER) [Entered: 07/13/2022 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellees American Family Insurance Company, U.S. Bank N.A. and Verizon Wireless, per District Court docket and information sheet. [2] [7248072] [22-2216] (ER) [Entered: 07/13/2022 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's federal other case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Firas M. Ayoubi by 07/18/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/26/2022 for Appellant Firas M. Ayoubi. Transcript information sheet due by 07/26/2022. [1] [7248061] [22-2216] (ER) [Entered: 07/13/2022 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
