Charles Holbrook v. State of Michigan
| CHARLES J. HOLBROOK |
| STATE OF MICHIGAN |
| 22-2288 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: The petition is DENIED. Diane S. Sykes, Chief Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge. [ # 1 ] [2] [7250684] [22-2288] (HTP) [Entered: 07/26/2022 04:05 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Other Extraordinary Writ filed. Fee due. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/04/2022 for Petitioner Charles J. Holbrook. [1] [7250031] [22-2288] (PS) [Entered: 07/22/2022 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Charles Holbrook v. State of Michigan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHARLES J. HOLBROOK | |
| Represented By: | Charles J. Holbrook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STATE OF MICHIGAN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
