Brian Burnside v. Kimberly Nelson, et al
| BRIAN A. BURNSIDE |
| KIMBERLY NELSON, WILL SMITH, BRIAN ASBELL, DCS HART, C. HOFMANN and ALEXANDER EDDLEMON |
| 22-2297 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Brian A. Burnside's "Affidavit of truth/fact" that is titled jurisdictional memorandum. (Note: Document contains jurisdictional statement and issues being raised on appeal.) [5] [7251694] [22-2295, 22-2296, 22-2297]--[Text updated 08/02/2022 by JR.] (MAN) [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Brian A. Burnside in 22-2295 to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7251691] [22-2295, 22-2296, 22-2297] (MAN) [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:29 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders that these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule is SUSPENDED pending a determination of appellants fee status in all three appeals. DW [3] [7250491] [22-2295, 22-2296, 22-2297] (HTP) [Entered: 07/26/2022 09:29 AM]
|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7250224] [22-2297] (PS) [Entered: 07/25/2022 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/05/2022. [1] [7250219] [22-2297] (PS) [Entered: 07/25/2022 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
