Al Holifield v. Jon Rivamonte, et al
| AL HOLIFIELD |
| JON RIVAMONTE, MIGUEL CORREA, KARL ZUBERBIER, DAVID LOPEZ and JOHN KALTENBRUN |
| 22-2301 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Al Holifield leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/08/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/11/2022 for Appellant Al Holifield [7259473] [4] [7259473] [22-2301] (AP) [Entered: 09/09/2022 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7250203] (Note: The Office of the WI Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [22-2301] (MM) [Entered: 07/25/2022 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Tod Kurtz, Dan Clark, Scott Marlock, City of Milwaukee, Eugene Nagler, Hidta Task Force, MMDE Group, South Milwaukee Police Department, Milwaukee Police Department and West Allis Police Department. [2] [7250193] [22-2301] (MM) [Entered: 07/25/2022 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. [1] [7250185] [22-2301] (MM) [Entered: 07/25/2022 10:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
