Deere & Company v. Charles Martin, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: DEERE & COMPANY
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES MARTIN, CURTIS MARTIN and BENNETT MACHINE & FABRICATING, INC.
Case Number: 22-2321
Filed: July 26, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [9] [7257033] [22-2321] (FP) [Entered: 08/26/2022 03:54 PM]
August 26, 2022 Filing 8 Motion filed by Appellants Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin to dismiss case. [8] [7256914] [22-2321] (Peiffer, Joseph) [Entered: 08/26/2022 12:26 PM]
August 26, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/26/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7257045-2] [7257045] [22-2321] (FP) [Entered: 08/26/2022 04:29 PM]
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: On consideration of the jurisdictional memorandum filed by appellee on August 18, 2022, appellants file, on or before August 26, 2022, a reply to appellees filing. Specifically, appellants must address the applicability of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(2) to this case. See Practitioners Handbook for Appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (2020 ed.) at p. 78. Appellants are reminded that a motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy their obligation to respond to this order. DW [7] [7255428] [22-2321] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:45 PM]
August 18, 2022 Filing 6 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee Deere & Company. [6] [7255260] [22-2321] (Rechtoris, Kenneth) [Entered: 08/18/2022 08:42 AM]
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellants on 08/10/2022, appellee shall file, on or before 08/18/2022, a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of 07/27/2022. DW[5] [7254214] [22-2321] (MM) [Entered: 08/11/2022 04:10 PM]
August 10, 2022 Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellants Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin. [4] [7253945] [22-2321] (Peiffer, Joseph) [Entered: 08/10/2022 05:39 PM]
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellants Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellants Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin by 08/23/2022. [3] [7253387] [22-2321] (AD) [Entered: 08/09/2022 08:55 AM]
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellants Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7250979] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellants Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin by 08/10/2022. DW [2] [7250979] [22-2321] (AP) [Entered: 07/27/2022 03:32 PM]
July 26, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin by 08/01/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 08/09/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 09/06/2022 for Bennett Machine & Fabricating, Inc., Charles Martin and Curtis Martin. [1] [7250573] [22-2321] (HTP) [Entered: 07/26/2022 12:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Deere & Company v. Charles Martin, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: DEERE & COMPANY
Represented By: Kenneth Rechtoris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CHARLES MARTIN
Represented By: Nicholas V. Critelli
Represented By: Bruce Charles Dopke
Represented By: Joseph A. Peiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CURTIS MARTIN
Represented By: Nicholas V. Critelli
Represented By: Bruce Charles Dopke
Represented By: Joseph A. Peiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BENNETT MACHINE & FABRICATING, INC.
Represented By: Nicholas V. Critelli
Represented By: Bruce Charles Dopke
Represented By: Joseph A. Peiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?