Valerie L. Flores v. Stonehouse Development, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: VALERIE L. FLORES, also known as VALERIE L. KREGER
Defendant / Appellee: STONEHOUSE DEVELOPMENT, KASIE SETTERLUND, KRISTIE JOHNSON, RICHARD B. ARNESEN, HELEN BRADBURY and JACKIE MURPHY
Case Number: 22-2375
Filed: August 3, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: Motion to Remand Back to Distirct Court and Change Case Type to Personal Injury Case and Motion to Stay Proceedings [ # 8 ] This court ordered appellant Valerie Flores to file a memorandum addressing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because she appeared to appealing from a non-final order. Flores has not responded to that order, and instead filed a motion to remand. Flores appealed from the district courts order determining that it lacked jurisdiction to review her amended complaint due to a pending appeal. Two weeks later, the district court screened Floress amended complaint and allowed her to proceed against two defendants. The district court then stayed proceedings pending resolution of this appeal. The district courts order is not a final order, see 28 U.S.C. 1291, nor is it the type of interlocutory decision over which this court has jurisdiction, see id. 1292(a), (b). Accordingly, the motion to remand is DENIED and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Diane S. Sykes, Chief Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and Thomas L. Kirsch II, Circuit Judge. [9] [7263736] [22-2375] (AD) [Entered: 09/29/2022 11:37 AM]
September 19, 2022 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Valerie L. Flores to remand case and to stay proceedings. [8] [7261447] [22-2375] (LCP) [Entered: 09/19/2022 03:22 PM]
September 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff-appellant Valerie Flores to show cause for her failure to respond to the courts order of August 9, 2022. Plaintiff-appellant Valerie Flores shall file her response on or before September 23, 2022. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of August 9, 2022, to appellants copy of this order. DW [7] [7259672] [22-2375]--[Edited 09/09/2022 by PS - to correct typo.] (PS) [Entered: 09/09/2022 04:24 PM]
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Appellant Valerie L. Flores is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Valerie L. Flores by 09/01/2022. [6] [7255280] [22-2375] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2022 09:26 AM]
August 16, 2022 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Valerie L. Flores in 22-2374, 22-2375, 22-2376, 22-2377, 22-2378 leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/16/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/15/2022 for Appellant Valerie L. Flores. Forwarded to DW and SCR. [7254798] [5] [7254798] [22-2374, 22-2375, 22-2376, 22-2377, 22-2378] (CG) [Entered: 08/16/2022 10:08 AM]
August 9, 2022 Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7253516] [22-2375] (AD) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:50 AM]
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Plaintiff-appellant Valerie L. Flores shall file, on or before 08/22/2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). DW [7253437] [3] [7253437] [22-2375] (MM) [Entered: 08/09/2022 10:15 AM]
August 3, 2022 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7252530] [22-2375] (PS) [Entered: 08/04/2022 02:14 PM]
August 3, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet filed. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Valerie L. Flores by 08/08/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/17/2022 for Appellant Valerie L. Flores. [1] [7252524] [22-2375] (PS) [Entered: 08/04/2022 02:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Valerie L. Flores v. Stonehouse Development, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VALERIE L. FLORES, also known as VALERIE L. KREGER
Represented By: Valerie L. Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STONEHOUSE DEVELOPMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KASIE SETTERLUND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KRISTIE JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARD B. ARNESEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HELEN BRADBURY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JACKIE MURPHY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?