J. Doe v. State of Illinois, et al
| J. DOE |
| STATE OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES and STEPHEN BALOGH |
| 22-2412 |
| August 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Prose motion filed by Appellant J. Doe to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (Note: Motion for IFP filed in appeal no. 22-2283 applied to appeal no. 22-2412.) [10] [7257578] [22-2412] (JR) [Entered: 08/30/2022 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant J. Doe leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/12/2022. (Note: District Court order filed in appeal no. 22-2283 applied to appeal no. 22-2412.) [9] [7257576] [22-2412] (JR) [Entered: 08/30/2022 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant J. Doe. [8] [7257468] [22-2412] (JR) [Entered: 08/30/2022 10:00 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for Extension of time to File Memorandum Due 08/24/2022 to 08/29/2022. [ # 6 ] The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant's jurisdictional memorandum is due by 08/29/2022. CDH [7] [7255295] [22-2412] (MM) [Entered: 08/18/2022 09:57 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant J. Doe to extend time to file jurisdictional memorandum. [6] [7255002] [22-2412] (CMD) [Entered: 08/16/2022 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant J. Doe. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2283, 21-2812 and 21-2830. [5] [7254999] [22-2412] (CMD) [Entered: 08/16/2022 04:53 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The question whether the district judge abused his discretion in declining to extend the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) will be addressed in Appeal No. 22-2283. As we explained in United States v. Kimberlin, 898 F.2d 1262, 1264 (7th Cir. 1990), it is superfluous to file notices to argue that the initial one places the case before us. Simply put, it is not necessary to file a separate appeal. Appellant shall file, on or before August 24, 2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7253925] DW [4] [7253925] [22-2412] (AP) [Entered: 08/10/2022 04:06 PM]
|
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7253776] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [22-2412] (AP) [Entered: 08/10/2022 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Joseph Birkett, Michael Burke, Paul Carpenter, David Doll, Chris Foster, Frank Haney, Frank Gerlick, Louise Gerlick, Donald Hudson, Ann Jorgensen, Lloyd Karmeier, David Kaske, Roxanne Kjellgren, Terresa Lagerstam, Robert Mangan, Tom McNamana, Terry Partridge, Carla Paschal, Kwami Raoul, Jennifer Stacy, James Sasik, Joanne Sasik, Amy Sommerville, Jill Sullivan, Dawn Thrall, Unknown City & State Employees & Agents.[2] [7253775] [22-2412] (AP) [Entered: 08/10/2022 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant J. Doe by 08/15/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 08/23/2022. [1] [7253774] [22-2412] (AP) [Entered: 08/10/2022 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
