Andre Powell v. Charles Bowen, et al
ANDRE V. POWELL |
CHARLES BOWEN and CRISTINA STOBAUGH |
22-2460 |
August 17, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: The District Court GRANTED the appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and the initial partial filing fee has been waived. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 10/31/2022 for Andre V. Powell. Appellee's brief due on or before 11/28/2022 for Charles Bowen and Cristina Stobaugh. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/19/2022 for Appellant Andre V. Powell [4] [7263797] [22-2460] (CAG) [Entered: 09/29/2022 01:26 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Andre V. Powell leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 09/27/2022. The initial partial filing fee is WAIVED. [3] [7263193] [22-2460] (CAG) [Entered: 09/27/2022 11:41 AM] |
Filing 2 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [2] [7258787] [22-2460] (CAG) [Entered: 09/07/2022 08:38 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/31/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/16/2022. [1] [7255597] [22-2460] (FP) [Entered: 08/19/2022 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.