Anjenai Bolden v. Michael Mezo, et al
| ANJENAI BOLDEN |
| MICHAEL N. MEZO and JEFFREY L. STALLINS |
| 22-2481 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 13 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 11/18/2022 for Anjenai Bolden. Appellees' brief due on or before 12/19/2022 for Michael N. Mezo and Jeffrey L. Stallins. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/09/2023 for Appellant Anjenai Bolden. SCR [14] [7262759] [22-1571, 22-2481] (HTP) [Entered: 09/26/2022 08:41 AM]
|
| Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anjenai Bolden in 22-1571, 22-2481 to extend time to file appellant's brief. [13] [7262650] [22-1571, 22-2481] (LCP) [Entered: 09/23/2022 02:01 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER re: Plaintiffs motion to the court of appeals in regards to the courts order for plaintiffs docketing statement and for appointment of counsel. [ # 10 ] Review of this courts docket shows that the court filed the appellants docketing statement in appeal no. 22-1571 on September 13, 2022. The court has updated the docket to reflect that the docketing statement is also filed in appeal no. 22-2481. Accordingly, the rule to show cause dated September 7, 2022, is VACATED. In light of the courts order dated September 16, 2022, the request for counsel and for a briefing extension will be filed without further court action. If the appellant needs more time to file his brief, he may move for additional extensions. The clerk will send the appellant this courts brief information sheet for pro se litigants so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the court's expectations for briefs, and copies of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the local Circuit Rules. SCR [12] [7261699] [22-1571, 22-2481] (PS) [Entered: 09/20/2022 12:20 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anjenai Bolden in 22-1571, 22-2481 for appointment of counsel and for clarification. [10] [7261420] [22-1571, 22-2481] (LCP) [Entered: 09/19/2022 03:05 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion for appointment of counsel. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for recruitment of counsel is DENIED. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc); Farmer v. Haas, 990 F.2d 319, 321 (7th Cir. 1993). The panel assigned to decide this case may recruit counsel if it finds that step appropriate after reviewing the briefs. Briefing in this consolidated appeal will proceed as follows: [ # 7 ] Appellant's consolidated brief due on or before 10/17/2022 for Anjenai Bolden. Appellees' consolidated brief due on or before 11/17/2022 for Michael N. Mezo and Jeffrey L. Stallins. Appellant's consolidated reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/08/2022 for Appellant Anjenai Bolden SCR [9] [7261132] [22-1571, 22-2481] (AP) [Entered: 09/16/2022 02:46 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion to appoint counsel filed by the appellant on September 13, 2022. SCR [8] [7260360] [22-1571, 22-2481] (AD) [Entered: 09/14/2022 08:44 AM]
|
| Filing 11 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Anjenai Bolden. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2481; 22-1670 (Document originally only filed in appeal no. 22-1571) [11] [7261680] [22-2481] (PS) [Entered: 09/20/2022 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anjenai Bolden in 22-1571, 22-2481 for appointment of counsel. [7] [7260226] [22-1571, 22-2481] (CAG) [Entered: 09/13/2022 02:24 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant Anjenai Bolden is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Anjenai Bolden by 09/21/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 6039. [6] [7258798] [22-2481]--[Edited 09/20/2022 by PS - VACATED per the court's 09/20/2022 order.] (AD) [Entered: 09/07/2022 08:58 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Anjenai Bolden. [5] [7258796] [22-2481] (AD) [Entered: 09/07/2022 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anjenai Bolden in 22-1571, 22-2481 to the court of appeals. [4] [7256968] [22-1571, 22-2481] (MAN) [Entered: 08/26/2022 02:23 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders that these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 10/03/2022 for Anjenai Bolden. Appellees' brief due on or before 11/02/2022 for Michael N. Mezo and Jeffrey L. Stallins. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/23/2022 for Appellant Anjenai Bolden. (See order for further details). DW [3] [7256508] [22-1571, 22-2481] (HTP) [Entered: 08/24/2022 03:08 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Notice VACATING the 08/22/2022 PLRA Fee Notice as erroneously issued. The filing fee is waived pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(iii). [2] [7256296] [22-2481] (CMD) [Entered: 08/23/2022 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Fee waived. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Anjenai Bolden by 08/26/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/21/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 09/06/2022. [1] [7256119] [22-2481]--[Edited 08/23/2022 by CMD as fee notice was vacated] (HTP) [Entered: 08/23/2022 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
