Brandon Bradley, Sr. v. David Mahoney, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDON D. BRADLEY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID MAHONEY, DERRICK WALKER, TOUA VUE, BEN JENNINGS and MARTIN KNOLL
Case Number: 22-2546
Filed: August 31, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2022 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Brandon D. Bradley, Sr. Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [9] [7262718] [22-2546] (MAN) [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:20 PM]
September 23, 2022 Filing 8 Prose motion filed by Appellant Brandon D. Bradley, Sr. to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [8] [7262717] [22-2546] (MAN) [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:18 PM]
September 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: re: Motion for time extension, filed on 9/8/2022. The motion is GRANTED. The appellant shall pay the required $505.00 appellate fees in the district court no later than October 11, 2022, or this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). [ # 6 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7016 0340 0001 1334 6199. [7] [7259950] CDH [22-2546] (FP) [Entered: 09/12/2022 04:50 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Brandon D. Bradley, Sr. for an extension of time. [6] [7259783] [22-2546] (CAG) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:19 AM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Brandon D. Bradley, Sr. leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/09/2022. [5] [7259773] [22-2546] (CAG) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:06 AM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 4 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. sec. 1915(g), appellant may not proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the pro se appellant pay the required $505 fees to the clerk of the district court or this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending resolution of appellant's fee status on appeal. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/26/2022 [4][7259771] [22-2546] (CAG) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:01 AM]
August 31, 2022 Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Jacob Zilli, Tim Algiers, Matt Earll, Drittan Lazami, Frank Smilgis, Bernard Baker, and John Klein. [3] [7257903] [22-2546] (HTP) [Entered: 08/31/2022 02:50 PM]
August 31, 2022 Filing 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. sec. 1915(g), appellant may not proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the pro se appellant pay the required $505 fees to the clerk of the district court or this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending resolution of appellant's fee status on appeal. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/14/2022. [2][7257900] [22-2546] (HTP) [Entered: 08/31/2022 02:46 PM]
August 31, 2022 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Brandon D. Bradley Sr. by 09/07/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 09/14/2022. [1] [7257898] [22-2546] (HTP) [Entered: 08/31/2022 02:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brandon Bradley, Sr. v. David Mahoney, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BRANDON D. BRADLEY, SR.
Represented By: Brandon D. Bradley Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID MAHONEY
Represented By: Matteo Reginato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DERRICK WALKER
Represented By: Matteo Reginato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOUA VUE
Represented By: Matteo Reginato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BEN JENNINGS
Represented By: Matteo Reginato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARTIN KNOLL
Represented By: Matteo Reginato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?