John Seely v. Holly A. Brady
Petitioner: JOHN SEELY
Respondent: HOLLY A. BRADY
Interested Party: JAMES SEELY, PHILLIP E. HOUK, Allen County Magistrate Judge, GREGORY PACHMAYR, Clerk of the Indiana Court of Appeals and ESTATE OF RICHARD E. SEELY
Case Number: 22-2553
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER re: Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Prohibition. This court construes John Seely's petition for a writ of prohibition as a notice of appeal for case No. 1:22-cv-00103 in the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. Accordingly, the clerk of this court shall transfer the petition to the district court to be docketed as a notice of appeal. The clerk shall also transfer the docketing fee paid for this petition to the district court to be credited toward the fees for the resulting appeal. Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge. [2] [7258469] [22-2553] (AD) [Entered: 09/02/2022 02:31 PM]
September 2, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/02/2022 Transfer Order and Petition sent to the District Court Clerk. [7258474-2] [7258474] [22-2553] (AD) [Entered: 09/02/2022 02:39 PM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Prohibition filed. Fee paid. Receipt #7000640. [1] [7258356] [22-2553] (PS) [Entered: 09/02/2022 11:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Seely v. Holly A. Brady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOHN SEELY
Represented By: John Seely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: HOLLY A. BRADY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: JAMES SEELY
Represented By: R. David Boyer II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: PHILLIP E. HOUK, Allen County Magistrate Judge
Represented By: Gustavo A. Jimenez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: GREGORY PACHMAYR, Clerk of the Indiana Court of Appeals
Represented By: Gustavo A. Jimenez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: ESTATE OF RICHARD E. SEELY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?