Cornelius Hines v. Nancy Marthakis, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CORNELIUS HINES
Defendant / Appellee: NANCY MARTHAKIS, DIANE THEWS and SHERRI FRITTER
Case Number: 22-2596
Filed: September 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Motion to extend time. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED only to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 required filing fees in the district court or file the required PLRA memorandum and asset affidavit in this court by October 31, 2022. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 6695. [5] [7262711] SCR [22-2596] (AP) [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:08 PM]
September 23, 2022 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Cornelius Hines to extend time to file the proper paperwork to file in forma pauperis. [4] [7262691] [22-2596] (CAG) [Entered: 09/23/2022 02:53 PM]
September 22, 2022 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Cornelius Hines leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/22/2022. [3] [7262351] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/24/2022 [22-2596] (CAG) [Entered: 09/22/2022 02:15 PM]
September 13, 2022 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7260456] (Note: The Office of the IN Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [22-2596] (FP) [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:41 AM]
September 13, 2022 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 09/27/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Cornelius Hines by 09/19/2022. [1] [7260451] [22-2596] (FP) [Entered: 09/14/2022 11:26 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cornelius Hines v. Nancy Marthakis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CORNELIUS HINES
Represented By: Cornelius Hines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NANCY MARTHAKIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DIANE THEWS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHERRI FRITTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?