Lamonte Ealy v. Dylon Radtke
| LAMONTE A. EALY |
| DYLON RADTKE |
| 22-2622 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 1 copy Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy. Disk not required. REMINDER: Hearing notices are mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [8] [7268446] [22-2622] (SK) [Entered: 10/24/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 7 An order has been received from the District Court dated 10/20/2022, denying a certificate of appealability. This appeal shall proceed accordingly. [7] [7268004] [22-2622] (JR) [Entered: 10/21/2022 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [6] [7265784] [22-2622] (CAG) [Entered: 10/11/2022 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7265783] [22-2622] (CAG) [Entered: 10/11/2022 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7265187] [22-2622] (KRA) [Entered: 10/06/2022 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy for Leave to Proceed On Appeal [3] [7264629] [22-2622] (KRA) [Entered: 10/04/2022 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/20/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/27/2022 for Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy [7263184] [2] [7263184] [22-2622] (AP) [Entered: 09/27/2022 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability pending. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lamonte A. Ealy by 09/22/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 09/29/2022. [1] [7260719] [22-2622]--[Edited 09/26/2022 by AD to reflect docket statement filed with Notice of Appeal.] (CG) [Entered: 09/15/2022 12:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lamonte Ealy v. Dylon Radtke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: LAMONTE A. EALY | |
| Represented By: | Lamonte A. Ealy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DYLON RADTKE | |
| Represented By: | Wisconsin Department of Justice - Habeas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
