Mitchell LaBrec v. Adam Sencibaugh, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: MITCHELL W. LABREC
Defendant / Appellee: ADAM SENCIBAUGH and JODI PAULSRUD
Case Number: 22-2627
Filed: September 15, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Motion to extend time to file and for appointment of counsel. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellants fee status has been resolved. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket shows that on October 13, 2022, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and assessed a $20.82 initial partial filing fee which has yet to be paid. Further, a briefing schedule has not been set. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary at this time. Once the appellant has paid the initial partial filing fee, this appeal will proceed to a ruling on appellants motion for appointment of counsel. [ # 4 ] [5] [7272284] CDH [22-2627] (AP) [Entered: 11/09/2022 08:55 AM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mitchell W. LaBrec for extension of time and for appointment of counsel. [4] [7271881] [22-2627] (LCP) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:55 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 3 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Mitchell W. LaBrec leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 10/13/2022. District Court has assessed a $20.82 initial partial filing fee. [3] [7266307] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 11/03/2022. [22-2627] (CAG) [Entered: 10/13/2022 02:03 PM]
September 26, 2022 Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mitchell W. LaBrec. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7263009] [22-2627] (KRA) [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:19 PM]
September 15, 2022 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet filed. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Mitchell W. LaBrec by 09/22/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/17/2022. [1] [7261031] [22-2627] (AD) [Entered: 09/16/2022 11:44 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mitchell LaBrec v. Adam Sencibaugh, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MITCHELL W. LABREC
Represented By: Mitchell W. LaBrec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ADAM SENCIBAUGH
Represented By: Remzy D. Bitar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JODI PAULSRUD
Represented By: Remzy D. Bitar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?