John Seely v. James Seely, et al
| JOHN SEELY |
| JAMES SEELY, PHILLIP E. HOUK and GREGORY PACHMAYR |
| 22-2651 |
| September 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. In light of this courts order dated October 26, 2022, which extended the briefing schedule, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED as unnecessary. [ # 8 ] CDH [9] [7270000] [22-2651] (AP) [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:51 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant John Seely to extend time to file appellant's brief and continuance. [8] [7269509] [22-2651] (CAG) [Entered: 10/27/2022 01:38 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER issued GRANTING Motion for Stay in Abeyance of Appellants Brief until Judgment of Petitioners Petition for Writ of Prohibition only to the extent that briefing is extended as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/16/2022 for John Seely. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/17/2023 for Phillip E. Houk, Gregory Pachmayr and James Seely. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/07/2023 for Appellant John Seely. JPK [7] [7269303] [22-2651] (AD) [Entered: 10/26/2022 03:51 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant John Seely to stay in abeyance of appellant's brief until judgment of petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition. [6] [7269300] [22-2651] (AD) [Entered: 10/26/2022 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Response by Appellees Phillip E. Houk and Gregory Pachmayr in 22-2562, 22-2651 to Court's Order. [5][7267923] [22-2562, 22-2651] (Jones, Benjamin) [Entered: 10/20/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Benjamin Jones for Appellees Phillip E. Houk and Gregory Pachmayr in 22-2562, 22-2651. [4] [7267716] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2562, 22-2651] (Jones, Benjamin) [Entered: 10/20/2022 07:36 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: On September 26, 2022, the plaintiff paid the required appellate filing fees. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that briefing in this appeal will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 11/16/2022 for John Seely. Appellees' briefs due on or before 12/16/2022 for Phillip E. Houk, Gregory Pachmayr and James Seely. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/06/2023 for Appellant John Seely. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellees brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). JR [7266913] [22-2651] (ER) [Entered: 10/17/2022 02:19 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant John Seely. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2553 [2] [7263072] [22-2651] (AD) [Entered: 09/26/2022 04:57 PM] |
| Notification from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received (receipt #INN1014311). [7266594-2] [7266594] [22-2651] (JR) [Entered: 10/14/2022 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 10/03/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant John Seely by 09/26/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/03/2022 for Appellant John Seely. [1] [7261635] [22-2651] (AD) [Entered: 09/20/2022 10:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
