Fiona Chen v. Janet Yellen, et al
| FIONA FENG CHEN |
| JANET YELLEN, TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION, EMPLOYEE CONDUCT AND COMPLIANCE OFFICE, LESIA PANEPINTO and MICHAEL PEACHER |
| 22-2655 |
| September 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER issued GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to December 20, 2022 to File Brief. [ # 9 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 12/20/2022 for Fiona Feng Chen. Appellees' briefs due on or before 01/19/2023 for Employee Conduct and Compliance Office, Lesia Panepinto, Michael Peacher, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration and Janet Yellen. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/09/2023 for Appellant Fiona Feng Chen. CDH [10] [7267269] [22-2655] (AD) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:24 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Fiona Feng Chen to extend time to file appellant's brief. [9] [7267048] [22-2655] (KRA) [Entered: 10/17/2022 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees Lesia Panepinto and Michael Peacher. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. Chen v. Yellen, 21-3110 [8] [7266797] [22-2655] (Horne, Jessica) [Entered: 10/17/2022 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jessica Horne for Appellees Lesia Panepinto and Michael Peacher in 22-2655. for Anne Dasovic, National Treasury Employees Union, Charles Turek. [7] [7265592] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2655, 21-3110] (Horne, Jessica) [Entered: 10/11/2022 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Fiona Feng Chen. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-3110 [6] [7264455] [22-2655] (LCP) [Entered: 10/03/2022 04:27 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 10/28/2022 for Fiona Feng Chen. Appellee's brief due on or before 11/28/2022 for Employee Conduct and Compliance Office, Lesia Panepinto, Michael Peacher, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration and Janet Yellen. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/19/2022 for Appellant Fiona Feng Chen [5] [7263464] [22-2655] (CAG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 01:15 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [4] [7263463] [22-2655] (CAG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 01:14 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7261858] [3] [7261858] [22-2655] (AD) [Entered: 09/20/2022 04:36 PM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Jamy Kilmnick, Gayle Trier, National Treasury Employees Union, Rebecca Solano, Charles Turek and Anne Dasovic. [2] [7261716] [22-2655] (ER) [Entered: 09/20/2022 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Fiona Feng Chen by 09/26/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 10/03/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/03/2022 for Appellant Fiona Feng Chen. [1] [7261712] [22-2655] (ER) [Entered: 09/20/2022 12:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
