USA v. Daniel Salley
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL E. SALLEY
Case Number: 22-2662
Filed: September 20, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 15, 2023 USA v. Daniel Salley

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2022 Filing 5 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Daniel E. Salley. Appellee's brief due on or before 12/05/2022 for United States of America. Disk not required. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [5] [7271207] [22-2662] (CAG) [Entered: 11/03/2022 02:11 PM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Daniel E. Salley. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2477, 22-2663 [4] [7267297] [22-2662] (KRA) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:56 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Daniel E. Salley. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2477, 22-2663 [3] [7265180] [22-2662] (CAG) [Entered: 10/06/2022 02:50 PM]
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Daniel E. Salley is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Daniel E. Salley by 10/18/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 6398. [2] [7264518] [22-2662] (AD) [Entered: 10/04/2022 09:14 AM]
September 29, 2022 Terminated Attorney Philip A. Guentert and added Attorney Scott D. Heffron for Appellee USA in case 22-2662, pursuant to email notification from the Office of the U.S. Attorney regarding counsel of record. [7263785-2] [7263785] [22-2662] (JR) [Entered: 09/29/2022 01:04 PM]
September 20, 2022 Filing 1 Federal prisoner's other case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Daniel E. Salley by 09/26/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 10/04/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/31/2022 for Daniel E. Salley. [1] [7261817] [22-2662] (ER) [Entered: 09/20/2022 03:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Daniel Salley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Philip A. Guentert
Represented By: Scott D. Heffron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DANIEL E. SALLEY
Represented By: Daniel E. Salley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?