William Lee v. Bruce Ippel, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM LEE
Defendant / Appellee: BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, LORETTA DAWSON and HOLLY DENMAN
Case Number: 22-2711
Filed: September 26, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 12, 2023 William Lee v. Bruce Ippel

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Letter filed on November 18, 2022, by the pro se appellant, which the court construes as a motion for extension of time. [ # 4 ] The motion is GRANTED. The appellant shall either pay the required $505.00 appellate fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the district court by December 19, 2022. [5] [7274364] CDH [22-2711] (AD) [Entered: 11/18/2022 04:18 PM]
November 18, 2022 Filing 4 Filed letter from Appellant William Lee regarding filing fee. [4] [7274280] [22-2711] (CAG) [Entered: 11/18/2022 01:53 PM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant William Lee. [3] [7266069] [22-2711] (HTP) [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:15 PM]
September 27, 2022 Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rachel D. Johnson for Appellees Loretta Dawson, Holly Denman and Bruce Ippel. [2] [7263241] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2711]--[Edited 09/27/2022 by FP to reflect that atty. Johnson is added to the docket.] (Johnson, Rachel) [Entered: 09/27/2022 01:30 PM]
September 26, 2022 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 10/11/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/26/2022. [1] [7263215] [22-2711] (AD) [Entered: 09/27/2022 12:18 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: William Lee v. Bruce Ippel, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: WILLIAM LEE
Represented By: William Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor
Represented By: Rachel Dubin Johnson
Represented By: Sarah J. Shores-Scisney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LORETTA DAWSON
Represented By: Rachel Dubin Johnson
Represented By: Sarah J. Shores-Scisney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HOLLY DENMAN
Represented By: Rachel Dubin Johnson
Represented By: Sarah J. Shores-Scisney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?