Linsford Gill v. David Mitchell
Petitioner / Appellant: LINSFORD GILL
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID MITCHELL
Case Number: 22-2720
Filed: September 27, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2022 Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Linsford Gill. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7268154] [22-2720] (MAN) [Entered: 10/21/2022 02:12 PM]
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: Notice regarding fee. A review of the courts docket shows that on September 29, 2022, the district court granted appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. This appeal is proceeding to a determination of whether a certificate of appealability should issue and to a ruling on appellants motion for appointment of counsel. CDH [7265979] [22-2720] (AP) [Entered: 10/12/2022 01:27 PM]
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Appellant Linsford Gill is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Linsford Gill by 10/26/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 6572. [8] [7265890] [22-2720] (AD) [Entered: 10/12/2022 08:53 AM]
October 11, 2022 Filing 7 Filed notice regarding fee by Appellant Linsford Gill. IFP Motion tendered. [7] [7265737] [22-2720] (MAN) [Entered: 10/11/2022 02:52 PM]
September 29, 2022 Filing 6 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Linsford Gill leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 09/29/2022. [6] [7263746] [22-2720] (AP) [Entered: 09/29/2022 12:04 PM]
September 28, 2022 Filing 5 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [5] [7263559] [22-2720] (CG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 03:13 PM]
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [4] [7263420] [22-2720] (CG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 11:18 AM]
September 27, 2022 Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Linsford Gill to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7263418] [22-2720] (CG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 11:15 AM]
September 27, 2022 Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Linsford Gill for appointment of counsel. [2] [7263417] [22-2720] (CG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 11:14 AM]
September 27, 2022 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 08/30/2022. IFP pending in the Appellate Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Linsford Gill by 10/03/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 10/11/2022. [1] [7263405] [22-2720] (CG) [Entered: 09/28/2022 10:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Linsford Gill v. David Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LINSFORD GILL
Represented By: Linsford Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID MITCHELL
Represented By: Katherine M. Doersch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?