Helene Miller v. Lions Gate Entertainment, Inc., et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant / Appellee: LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, PHARMA and CANN INC.
Case Number: 22-2812
Filed: October 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2022 Filing 17 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller, per order. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [17] [7277980] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:20 AM]
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER issued GRANTING My Motion with/Renewed Tendered Circuit Rule 3(c), construed as a motion to recall the mandate. [ # 15 ] This courts final order dated November 28, 2022, is VACATED, the mandate is RECALLED, and this appeal is REINSTATED. The clerk shall file INSTANTER the appellants docketing statement. This appeal will proceed to a determination of appellants fee status, currently pending in the district court. SCR [16] [7277977] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:13 AM]
December 8, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 12/08/2022 Order Vacating Dismissal/Recalling Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7277979-2] [7277979] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:19 AM]
December 7, 2022 Filing 15 Prose motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to recall the mandate, per order. 1 copy docketing statement tendered. [15] [7277829] [22-2812] (MAN) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:26 PM]
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re: Motions. The motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal in a motion that includes a tendered Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. Any such motion is due by January 3, 2023. [ # 13 ] CDH [14] [7276840] [22-2812] (HTP) [Entered: 12/02/2022 01:06 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to recall the mandate. [13] [7276446] [22-2812] (CAG) [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:54 AM]
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(c). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [12] [7275437] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 11/28/2022 12:14 PM]
November 28, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 11/28/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7275439-2] [7275439] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 11/28/2022 12:25 PM]
November 23, 2022 Filing 11 Prose motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [11] [7275212] [22-2812] (CAG) [Entered: 11/23/2022 02:53 PM]
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: My brief memorandum. The appellants request to consolidate these two appeals is DENIED without prejudice to renewal after the jurisdictional issue in 22-3006 is resolved. To the extent that the appellant is requesting to file documents electronically, the request is DENIED. The appellant is reminded that if she wants to receive court documents via email she can register for an ECF account on this court's website. For more information about receiving electronic notifications from the court, the appellant may contact the clerk's office. [ # 9 ] SCR [10] [7274020] [22-3006, 22-2812] (HTP) [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:08 PM]
November 10, 2022 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller in 22-3006, 22-2812 Memorandum. [9] [7273088] [22-3006, 22-2812] (LCP) [Entered: 11/14/2022 01:05 PM]
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: Response to October 17, 2022/Request to consolidate both cases for appeal due process complaint of concern/motion for efiling of further correspondence. [ # 7268253-2 ] [ # 7268253-3 ] The request to file electronically in these appeals is DENIED. To the extent that the appellant wants to receive court documents via email she can register for an ECF account on this court's website. For more information about receiving electronic notifications from the court, the appellant may contact the clerk's office. The appellants request to consolidate is DENIED. If both appeals proceed after the jurisdictional review is complete, the court may consolidate at that time. SCR [8] [7272540] [22-2262, 22-2812] (CG) [Entered: 11/09/2022 03:41 PM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 7 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR [7] [7271989] [22-3006, 22-2262, 22-2812] (AP) [Entered: 11/08/2022 09:31 AM]
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller by 11/14/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 8361. [6] [7269673] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 10/28/2022 09:35 AM]
October 27, 2022 Filing 5 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [5] [7269616] [22-2812] (AP) [Entered: 10/27/2022 04:16 PM]
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [4] [7269570] [22-2812] (CG) [Entered: 10/27/2022 02:44 PM]
October 27, 2022 Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7269524] [22-2812] (MAN) [Entered: 10/27/2022 01:56 PM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7266556] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 10/14/2022 11:02 AM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 10/26/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller by 10/14/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/26/2022 for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller. [1] [7266551] [22-2812] (AD) [Entered: 10/14/2022 10:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Helene Miller v. Lions Gate Entertainment, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Represented By: Helene Tonique Laurent Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE & COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHARMA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CANN INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?