Scott Peters v. Keith Von Allmen, et al
| MARIO CASCIARO |
| SCOTT PETERS |
| KEITH VON ALLMEN, in his individual capacity, CITY OF JOHNSBURG, KENNETH RYDBERG and UNKNOWN CITY OF JOHNSBURG POLICE OFFICERS |
| 22-2852 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: The appellant has filed a memorandum in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, but he has not filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or asset affidavit. The appellant shall file the overdue motion by January 17, 2023, or this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Cir. R. 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0001 4762 4129. [11] [7279309] SCR [22-2852] (HTP) [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:12 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Caption Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 84 Forms (1). A review of the courts docket shows that Keith Von Allmen, the City of Johnsburg, Kenneth Rydberg, and Unknown City of Johnsburg Police Officers are listed as appellees to the appeal. Accordingly, the motion is filed without further court action. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. [10] [7275234] CDH [22-2852] (AD) [Entered: 11/23/2022 03:19 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Scott Peters Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [9] [7274617] [22-2852] (CAG) [Entered: 11/21/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Scott Peters. [8] [7274609] [22-2852] (MAN) [Entered: 11/21/2022 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Scott Peters. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7271526] [22-2852] (MAN) [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Scott Peters leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/24/2022. [6] [7268577] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/25/2022 [22-2852] (CAG) [Entered: 10/25/2022 08:28 AM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: 1. Motion for appointment of counsel. 2. Motion for certificate of appealability. [ # 3 ] [ # 4 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellant's fee status has been determined. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the courts docket indicates that the appellants motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis remains pending. Accordingly, the motions are DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notice and order dated October 19, 2022. The appellant is reminded that his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement is due by October 26, 2022. CDH [5] [7268101] [22-2852] (PS) [Entered: 10/21/2022 12:20 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Scott Peters for certificate of appealability. [4] [7267953] [22-2852] (MM) [Entered: 10/20/2022 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Scott Peters for appointment of counsel. [3] [7267952] [22-2852] (MM) [Entered: 10/20/2022 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee Unknown City of Johnsburg Police Officers, per District Court docket and information sheet. [2] [7267951] [22-2852] (MM) [Entered: 10/20/2022 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet filed. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Scott Peters by 10/26/2022. [1] [7267945] [22-2852] (MM) [Entered: 10/20/2022 03:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
