Michael Garland v. Exelon Corporation, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL GARLAND
Defendant / Appellee: EXELON CORPORATION, COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, JESSICA MANGUM-ALLEN, YVETTE DANIELS, KATHY EGAN, ROSEMARY COLELLA-SEAVEY and CRAIG WEBER
Case Number: 22-2857
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Filing 12 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellees Rosemary Colella-Seavey, Commonwealth Edison Company, Yvette Daniels, Kathy Egan, Exelon Corporation, Jessica Mangum-Allen and Craig Weber. [12] [7276628] [22-2857] (Sweitzer, Stephanie) [Entered: 12/01/2022 04:42 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 11 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellees Rosemary Colella-Seavey, Commonwealth Edison Company, Yvette Daniels, Kathy Egan, Exelon Corporation, Jessica Mangum-Allen and Craig Weber. [11] [7276627] [22-2857] (Sweitzer, Stephanie) [Entered: 12/01/2022 04:41 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees Rosemary Colella-Seavey, Commonwealth Edison Company, Yvette Daniels, Kathy Egan, Exelon Corporation, Jessica Mangum-Allen and Craig Weber. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7276625] [22-2857] (Looby, James) [Entered: 12/01/2022 04:38 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney James P. Looby for Appellees Rosemary Colella-Seavey, Commonwealth Edison Company, Yvette Daniels, Kathy Egan, Exelon Corporation, Jessica Mangum-Allen and Craig Weber. [9] [7276594] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2857] (Looby, James) [Entered: 12/01/2022 03:44 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Stephanie L. Sweitzer for Appellees Rosemary Colella-Seavey, Commonwealth Edison Company, Yvette Daniels, Kathy Egan, Exelon Corporation, Jessica Mangum-Allen and Craig Weber. [8] [7276590] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2857] [8] [7276590] [22-2857]--[Edited 12/02/2022 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Sweitzer, Stephanie) [Entered: 12/01/2022 03:40 PM]
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 6 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 12/27/2022 for Michael Garland. Appellees' brief due on or before 01/26/2023 for Rosemary Colella-Seavey, Commonwealth Edison Company, Yvette Daniels, Kathy Egan, Exelon Corporation, Jessica Mangum-Allen and Craig Weber. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/16/2023 for Appellant Michael Garland. CDH [7] [7274800] [22-2857] (PS) [Entered: 11/22/2022 11:11 AM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael Garland to extend time to file appellant's brief. [6] [7274664] [22-2857] (CAG) [Entered: 11/21/2022 04:00 PM]
November 17, 2022 Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael Garland. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7274044] [22-2857] (LCP) [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:53 PM]
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Michael Garland is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Michael Garland by 11/17/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 8439. [4] [7271045] [22-2857] (AD) [Entered: 11/03/2022 09:25 AM]
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 11/25/2022 for Michael Garland. Appellee's brief due on or before 12/27/2022 for Rosemary Colella-Seavey, Commonwealth Edison Company, Yvette Daniels, Kathy Egan, Exelon Corporation, Jessica Mangum-Allen and Craig Weber. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/17/2023 for Appellant Michael Garland [3] [7269029] [22-2857] (CAG) [Entered: 10/26/2022 09:52 AM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 2 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [2] [7269028] [22-2857] (CAG) [Entered: 10/26/2022 09:50 AM]
October 19, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Garland by 10/25/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 11/02/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/02/2022 for Appellant Michael Garland. [1] [7267976] [22-2857] (PS) [Entered: 10/20/2022 04:28 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Garland v. Exelon Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL GARLAND
Represented By: Michael Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EXELON CORPORATION
Represented By: James Looby
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
Represented By: James Looby
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JESSICA MANGUM-ALLEN
Represented By: James Looby
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: YVETTE DANIELS
Represented By: James Looby
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KATHY EGAN
Represented By: James Looby
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROSEMARY COLELLA-SEAVEY
Represented By: James Looby
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CRAIG WEBER
Represented By: James Looby
Represented By: Stephanie L. Sweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?