Nancy Roe v. Board of Trustees of Purdue University, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: NANCY ROE
Defendant / Appellant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY, ALYSA ROLLOCK and KATIE SERMERSHEIM
Case Number: 22-2890
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: Status report of December 21, 2022. [ # 9 ] Appellants shall file, on or before January 18, 2023, a further status report regarding the disposition of their post-judgment motion. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [10] [7282768] [22-2890] (PS) [Entered: 01/05/2023 09:04 AM]
December 21, 2022 Filing 9 Filed status report by Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. [9] [7280683] [22-2890] (Kealey, William) [Entered: 12/21/2022 02:25 PM]
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: On consideration of the Response filed by appellants on November 28, 2022, appellants shall file, on or before December 21, 2022, a further status report regarding the disposition of their post-judgment motion. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [8] [7277796] [22-2890] (AD) [Entered: 12/07/2022 02:44 PM]
November 28, 2022 Filing 7 Filed Response by Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim Appellee Nancy Roe to Response of Appellants to November 8, 2022 Order. [7][7275366] [22-2890]--[Edited 11/28/2022 by HTP to reflect appellants' response] (Kealey, William) [Entered: 11/28/2022 10:14 AM]
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: On consideration of the Response filed by appellants on November 7, 2022, appellants shall file, on or before November 28, 2022, a status report regarding the disposition of their post-judgment motion. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [6] [7272174] [22-2890] (PS) [Entered: 11/08/2022 02:46 PM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 5 Filed Response by Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim to October 25, 2022 Order. [5][7271730] [22-2890] (Kealey, William) [Entered: 11/07/2022 12:49 PM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7269717] [22-2890] (Kealey, William) [Entered: 10/28/2022 11:00 AM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Joseph Heavrin Harrison III for party(s) Appellant Alysa Rollock Appellant Katie Sermersheim Appellant Board of Trustees of Purdue University, in case 22-2890 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney William P. Kealey, Joseph H. Harrison III for Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. [3] [7269713] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2890]--[Edited 10/28/2022 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Kealey, William) [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:54 AM]
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Defendants-appellants shall file, on or before November 7, 2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). DW [2] [2] [7268959] [22-2890] (HTP) [Entered: 10/25/2022 04:48 PM]
October 24, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim by 10/28/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 11/07/2022. Appellants' brief due on or before 12/05/2022 for Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. [1] [7268755] [22-2890] (MM) [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:53 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nancy Roe v. Board of Trustees of Purdue University, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: NANCY ROE
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Macey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Represented By: William Peter Kealey
Represented By: Joseph Heavrin Harrison III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ALYSA ROLLOCK
Represented By: William Peter Kealey
Represented By: Joseph Heavrin Harrison III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: KATIE SERMERSHEIM
Represented By: William Peter Kealey
Represented By: Joseph Heavrin Harrison III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?