Demetrius Anchondo v. Aperion Nursing Home, et al
| DEMETRIUS ANCHONDO |
| APERION NURSING HOME, JALISHA and ADAI |
| 22-2897 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Filed District Court order GRANTING Plaintiff Demetrius Anchondo's renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the District Court and assessing Plaintiff a $14.97 partial filing fee The motion for attorney representation is denied and Plantiff's application to appeal in forma pauperis is terminated as moot. (See order for further details). Date IFP granted: 11/18/2022. [11] [7274191] [22-2897]--[Edited 11/21/2022 by JR.] (MM) [Entered: 11/18/2022 11:32 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER re: Letter. In light of the courts final order dated 11/08/2022, the clerk will take no action on the appellants letter. CDH [10] [7272768] [22-2897] (MM) [Entered: 11/10/2022 02:14 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Filed letter from Appellant Demetrius Anchondo. [9] [7272766] [22-2897] (MM) [Entered: 11/10/2022 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [8] [7272216] [22-2897] (CG) [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:40 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: District Court Order of October 31, 2022. This case is REMANDED to the district court pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1 for proceedings consistent with its order issued on October 31, 2022. The appeal is dismissed and the mandate shall issue forthwith. Any party dissatisfied with the judgment as modified must file a fresh notice of appeal. Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge. [7] [7272201] [22-2897] (CG) [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:20 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 11/08/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7272220-2] [7272220] [22-2897] (CG) [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Demetrius Anchondo Memorandum. [6] [7271903] [22-2897] (MAN) [Entered: 11/07/2022 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order dated 11/01/2022, For the reasons discussed below, this court requests that the Court of Appeals remand the case so that this court may grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court case and consider Plaintiffs complaint. See Fed. R. App. P. 12.1; Fed. R.. Forwarded to SCR. [5] [7270342] [22-2897] (CAG) [Entered: 11/01/2022 08:34 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Letter. [ # 3 ] A review of the courts docket shows that the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending in the district court. Because it is unclear what relief the appellant seeks, the letter will be filed without further court action. The clerk shall send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. The appellants Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement is due by November 14, 2022. CDH [4] [7269726] [22-2897] (PS) [Entered: 10/28/2022 11:12 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed letter from Appellant Demetrius Anchondo regarding appeal. [3] [7269583] [22-2897] (MAN) [Entered: 10/27/2022 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7268650] [22-2897] (HTP) [Entered: 10/25/2022 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Demetrius Anchondo by 10/28/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 11/07/2022. [1] [7268646] [22-2897] (HTP) [Entered: 10/25/2022 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
