Thomas Lasnoski v. Heidi Michel, et al
| THOMAS J. LASNOSKI |
| HEIDI MICHEL, LIEUTENANT JOLLY, EMILY BLOZINSKI, AIVA GONZALES and KEN ANULIGO, Doctor |
| 22-2928 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 1 copy of Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Thomas J. Lasnoski. Disk not required. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [7] [7280669] [22-2928] (GW) [Entered: 12/21/2022 02:03 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant Thomas J. Lasnoski is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Thomas J. Lasnoski by 01/03/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 9498. [6] [7279923] [22-2928] (AD) [Entered: 12/19/2022 09:50 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7279524] DW [5] [7279524] [22-2928] (FP) [Entered: 12/15/2022 01:09 PM]
|
| Filing 4 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $65.24 from Appellant Thomas J. Lasnoski on 12/09/2022. [4] [7278501] [22-2928] (CAG) [Entered: 12/09/2022 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Thomas J. Lasnoski leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 11/16/2022. District Court has assessed a $65.24 initial partial filing fee. [3] [7273742] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 12/16/2022. [22-2928] (CAG) [Entered: 11/16/2022 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Diane Jensen. [2] [7269480] [22-2928] (HTP) [Entered: 10/27/2022 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Thomas J. Lasnoski by 11/02/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 11/10/2022. [1] [7269475] [22-2928] (HTP) [Entered: 10/27/2022 12:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
