Michael Ortega v. Anthony Wills
| MICHAEL ORTEGA |
| ANTHONY WILLS |
| 22-2929 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Allyson Elena Riemma for Appellant Michael Ortega has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7276047] [22-2929] (LJ) [Entered: 11/30/2022 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Allyson Riemma for Appellant Michael Ortega. [7] [7273522] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2929] --[Edited 11/15/2022 by ER - added Attorney Allyson Riemma] (Riemma, Allyson) [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Neha Khandhadia for Appellant Michael Ortega. [6] [7273494] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2929]--[Edited 11/15/2022 by FP to reflect that atty. Khandhadia is added to the docket.] (Khandhadia, Neha) [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jeffrey E. Stone for Appellant Michael Ortega. [5] [7273476] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2929] (Stone, Jeffrey) [Entered: 11/15/2022 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney Joshua M. Schneider for Appellee Anthony Wills. [4] [7271609] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-2929] [4] [7271609] [22-2929]--[Edited 11/07/2022 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Schneider, Joshua) [Entered: 11/07/2022 08:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 Motion filed by Appellant Michael Ortega Motion for Certificate of Appealability. [3] [7270897] [22-2929] (Stone, Jeffrey) [Entered: 11/02/2022 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael Ortega. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7270886] [22-2929] (Stone, Jeffrey) [Entered: 11/02/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 09/27/2022. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Ortega by 11/02/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 11/10/2022. [1] [7269487] [22-2929] (ER) [Entered: 10/27/2022 01:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Ortega v. Anthony Wills | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL ORTEGA | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey E. Stone |
| Represented By: | Neha Khandhadia |
| Represented By: | Allyson Elena Riemma |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: ANTHONY WILLS | |
| Represented By: | Katherine M. Doersch |
| Represented By: | Joshua M. Schneider |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
