Lisa Alcorn v. City of Chicago, et al
| LISA ALCORN, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of TYLER LUMAR |
| CITY OF CHICAGO, JUSTIN CONNER, Officer #18863, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, KE PEALS, Officer and KEVIN GEYER |
| 22-2948 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Appearance form filed by Attorney Bryan J. O'Connor for Appellant Lisa Alcorn. [9] [7276451] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2948]--[Edited 12/01/2022 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (O'Connor, Bryan) [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:58 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 01/09/2023 for Lisa Alcorn. Appellees' briefs due on or before 02/09/2023 for City of Chicago, Justin Conner, Cook County, Illinois, Kevin Geyer and Ke Peals. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/02/2023 for Appellant Lisa Alcorn JB [7271765] [22-2948] (AP) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:34 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted via Zoom, Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB. [7] [7271760] [22-2948] (AP) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Suzanne M. Loose for Appellees City of Chicago, Justin Conner, Kevin Geyer and Ke Peals. Additional Parties: Lieutenant Dany Masters Helwink, Officer Alexander, Officer Vinson, Sergeant Weslene O'Donnell, Sergeant John Gartner, and Charles Barry. [6] [7271615] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-2948] [Edited 11/07/2022 by CG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 11/07/2022 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Lisa Alcorn. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7271266] [22-2948] (Pechous, Donald) [Entered: 11/03/2022 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney John Power for Appellee Cook County, Illinois. Additional Parties: Cook County, Sheriff Dart, Officer Wlodarski. [4] [7270498] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-2948]--[Edited 11/01/2022 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Power, John) [Entered: 11/01/2022 02:03 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7270294] [3] [7270294] [22-2948] (CG) [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:18 PM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: Lieutenant Dany Masters Helwink, Officer Alexander, Officer Vinson, Sergeant Weslene O'Donnell, Sergeant John Gartner, Charles Barry, Thomas J. Dart, Officer T. Wlodarski, Daniel Warren, Carlos Vega, Corrina Esteban, Jones L. James, and Jonathan Errum. [2] [7270090] [22-2948] (CG) [Entered: 10/31/2022 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lisa Alcorn by 11/04/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 11/14/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 12/07/2022 for Lisa Alcorn. [1] [7270087] [22-2948] (CG) [Entered: 10/31/2022 12:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
