La' Ron Matlock v. Daniel Sproul
| LA' RON MATLOCK, also known as LARON MATLOCK |
| DANIEL SPROUL, Warden |
| 22-2999 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: On December 6, 2022, the District Court granted the petitioners motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 01/06/2023 for La' Ron Matlock. Appellee's brief due on or before 02/06/2023 for Daniel Sproul. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/27/2023 for Appellant La' Ron Matlock. JR [7277869] [22-2999] (ER) [Entered: 12/07/2022 04:09 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant La' Ron Matlock leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 12/06/2022. [9] [7277525] [22-2999] (AP) [Entered: 12/06/2022 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Daniel Sproul. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7276818] [22-2999] (Pfeffer, David) [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney David J. Pfeffer for Appellee Daniel Sproul. [7] [7276815] [22-2999]--[Edited 12/02/2022 by HTP to reflect appearance form filed.] (Pfeffer, David) [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [6] [7274535] [22-2999] (AP) [Entered: 11/21/2022 12:34 PM] |
|
Filing 5
Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal and prisoner trust account statement to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [5] [7274343] [22-2999] (MM) [Entered: 11/18/2022 03:31 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed prisoner trust fund account statement by Appellant La' Ron Matlock. (Pulled from 11/18/2022 docketing statement.) [4] [7274316] [22-2999] (CG) [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant La' Ron Matlock. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7274297] [22-2999] (KRA) [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Prose motion filed by Appellant La' Ron Matlock to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7274296] [22-2999] (KRA) [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant La' Ron Matlock by 11/14/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/18/2022 for Appellant La' Ron Matlock. Transcript information sheet due by 11/18/2022. [1] [7271653] [22-2999] (MM) [Entered: 11/07/2022 10:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: La' Ron Matlock v. Daniel Sproul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: LA' RON MATLOCK, also known as LARON MATLOCK | |
| Represented By: | La' Ron Matlock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DANIEL SPROUL, Warden | |
| Represented By: | David J. Pfeffer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
