Helene Miller v. Carol Howard, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER, also known as HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee: CAROL M. HOWARD, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF CHICAGO and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Case Number: 22-3003
Filed: November 4, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2022 Filing 15 Filed Objection by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to docket entry 100. [15][7282008] [22-3003] (CAG) [Entered: 12/30/2022 01:19 PM]
December 8, 2022 Filing 14 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-2781, 22-2262, 22-3006, 22-2951, 22-2812 [14] [7278150] [22-3003] (KRA) [Entered: 12/08/2022 03:49 PM]
December 8, 2022 Filing 13 Prose motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [13] [7278148] [22-3003] (KRA) [Entered: 12/08/2022 03:47 PM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 12 Appearance form filed by Attorney Alexandra Weiss for Appellee City of Chicago. [12] [7277552] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-3003] [Edited 12/06/2022 by CG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Weiss, Alexandra) [Entered: 12/06/2022 03:45 PM]
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re: Motions, filed on December 1, 2022. To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The appellant shall either pay the required $505.00 appellate filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of this court by December 30, 2022. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellants Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement is due by December 23, 2022. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. [ # 9 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 5148. [ # 9 ] CDH [11] [7276918] [22-3003] (ER) [Entered: 12/02/2022 03:15 PM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 10 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 11/30/2022. [10] [7276847] [22-3003] (JR) [Entered: 12/02/2022 01:10 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to be granted in forma pauperis and to extend time to file the docketing statement [9] [7276449] [22-3003] (CAG) [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:56 AM]
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller by 12/07/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 9047. [8] [7275038] [22-3003] (AD) [Entered: 11/23/2022 10:27 AM]
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [7] [7274883] [22-3003] (MM) [Entered: 11/22/2022 02:54 PM]
November 22, 2022 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to be granted in forma pauperis. [6] [7274844] [22-3003] (CAG) [Entered: 11/22/2022 12:57 PM]
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Brief Memorandum. [ # 3 ] [ # 7273917-3 ] [ # 3 ] [ # 7273917-2 ] On 11/02/2022, this court dismissed appeal no. 22-2727 for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appellants request to consolidate these appeals is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellants request to file electronically in these appeals is DENIED. To the extent that the appellant wants to receive court documents via email she can register for an ECF account on this court's website. For more information about receiving electronic notifications from the court, the appellant may contact the clerk's office. SCR [5] [7273922] [22-3003, 22-2727]--[Edited 12/01/2022 by MAN to reflect correct date of final order of 11/02/2022.] (MM) [Entered: 11/17/2022 12:38 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney SUZANNE M. LOOSE for Appellee City of Chicago. [4] [7272958] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-3003] -[Edited 11/14/2022 by ER - terminated Attorney Danielle M. Alvarez and added Attorney Suzanne M. Loose] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:39 AM]
November 10, 2022 Filing 3 Pro se brief memorandum filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller. [3] [7272868] [22-3003] (MAN) [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:43 PM]
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record indicates that this appeal is unnecessary. Appellant seeks review of the district courts order denying leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) directs that an appellant should re-file his motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the merits appealthe earlier appeal that appellant filed; it is not necessary to file a separate appeal. Accordingly, appellant shall file, on or before November 28, 2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. [7272164] DW [2] [7272164] [22-3003] (AD) [Entered: 11/08/2022 02:38 PM]
November 4, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller by 11/09/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 11/18/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/18/2022 for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller. [1] [7271772] [22-3003] (ER) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Helene Miller v. Carol Howard, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER, also known as HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS
Represented By: Helene Tonique Laurent Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CAROL M. HOWARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO
Represented By: Danielle M. Alvarez
Represented By: Alexandra Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?