Fredrick Walker v. Timothy Price, et al
FREDRICK WALKER, also known as FREDERICK WALKER |
TIMOTHY PRICE, GLENDAL FRENCH and JEFFREY STAHL |
22-3029 |
November 9, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: A notice of appeal filed before the district court issues its ruling on a timely tolling motion is ineffective until the order disposing of the motion is entered on the district court's civil docket. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff-appellant Fredrick Walker shall file, on or before January 18, 2023, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [3] [3] [7282789] [22-3029] (AP) [Entered: 01/05/2023 09:39 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed notice from the District Court that the $505.00 appellate fee was received. [2][7281573] [22-3029] (CAG) [Entered: 12/28/2022 10:16 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 11/23/2022. [1] [7272689] [22-3029] (MM) [Entered: 11/10/2022 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.