Craig Pierce, et al v. Whiteside School District No. 115 Board of Educati
| CRAIG PIERCE, as parent, next friend and guardian of B.P., a minor and NICOLE PIERCE, as parent, next friend and guardian of B.P., a minor |
| WHITESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 BOARD OF EDUCATION |
| 22-3106 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: Appellees provide a complete docketing statement no later than January 26, 2023. (See order for details) DW [12] [7285940] [22-3106] (AP) [Entered: 01/19/2023 04:18 PM]
|
| Filing 11 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Whiteside School District No. 115 Board of Education. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [11] [7285828] [22-3106] (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta) [Entered: 01/19/2023 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Natalie T. Lorenz for Appellants Craig Pierce and Nicole Pierce has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [10] [7282886] [22-3106] (LJ) [Entered: 01/05/2023 12:05 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants" brief due on or before 02/21/2023 for Craig Pierce and Nicole Pierce. Appellee's brief due on or before 03/23/2023 for Whiteside School District No. 115 Board of Education. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 04/13/2023 for Appellants Craig Pierce and Nicole Pierce JNS [7279322] [22-3106] (FP) [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:53 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Wednesday, January 18, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JNS. [8] [7279319] [22-3106] (FP) [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Whiteside School District No. 115 Board of Education. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7279095] [22-3106] (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta) [Entered: 12/13/2022 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Natalie T. Lorenz for Appellants Craig Pierce and Nicole Pierce. [6] [7278931] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-3106] [Edited 12/13/2022 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Lorenz, Natalie) [Entered: 12/13/2022 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Mark S. Schuver for Appellants Craig Pierce and Nicole Pierce. [5] [7278744] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-3106] (Schuver, Mark) [Entered: 12/12/2022 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Nikoleta Lamprinakos for Appellee Whiteside School District No. 115 Board of Education. [4] [7278518] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-3106] (Lamprinakos, Nikoleta) [Entered: 12/09/2022 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Craig Pierce and Nicole Pierce. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. Docketing Statement [3] [7275902] [22-3106]--[Edited 11/29/2022 by PS - to clarify docket text.] (Schuver, Mark) [Entered: 11/29/2022 04:22 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The appellants shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before December 5, 2022. (See order for details.) DW [2] [7275875] [22-3106] (CG) [Entered: 11/29/2022 03:22 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 12/06/2022. Appellants' brief due on or before 01/03/2023 for Craig Pierce and Nicole Pierce. [1] [7275146] [22-3106] (PS) [Entered: 11/23/2022 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Craig Pierce, et al v. Whiteside School District No. 115 Board of Educati | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: CRAIG PIERCE, as parent, next friend and guardian of B.P., a minor | |
| Represented By: | Mark S. Schuver |
| Represented By: | Natalie T. Lorenz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: NICOLE PIERCE, as parent, next friend and guardian of B.P., a minor | |
| Represented By: | Mark S. Schuver |
| Represented By: | Natalie T. Lorenz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WHITESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 BOARD OF EDUCATION | |
| Represented By: | Nikoleta Lamprinakos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
