Elvin Farris v. Vector Construction
| ELVIN FARRIS |
| VECTOR CONSTRUCTION |
| 22-3183 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Elvin Farris v. Vector Construction |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Amended Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Matthew E. Tews for Appellee Vector Construction. [15] [7287960] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-3183] (Tews, Matthew) [Entered: 01/30/2023 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Benjamin D. Woodard for Appellee Vector Construction has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [14] [7285799] [22-3183] (LJ) [Entered: 01/19/2023 12:42 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 02/23/2023 for Elvin Farris. Appellee's brief due on or before 03/27/2023 for Vector Construction. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 04/17/2023 for Appellant Elvin Farris. RJS [7283242] [22-3183] (HTP) [Entered: 01/06/2023 02:18 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Monday, January 23, 2023 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [12] [7283240] [22-3183] (HTP) [Entered: 01/06/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 11 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Vector Construction. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [11] [7281417] [22-3183] (Tews, Matthew) [Entered: 12/27/2022 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Matthew E. Tews for Appellee Vector Construction. [10] [7281396] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-3183] [Edited 12/27/2022 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Tews, Matthew) [Entered: 12/27/2022 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Elvin Farris. [9] [7280527] [22-3183] (Schmidt, Randall) [Entered: 12/21/2022 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 8 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Elvin Farris. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7280520] [22-3183] (Schmidt, Randall) [Entered: 12/21/2022 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Randall D. Schmidt for Appellant Elvin Farris. [7] [7280362] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-3183] [Edited 12/20/2022 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Schmidt, Randall) [Entered: 12/20/2022 12:16 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Motion. The motion is DENIED without prejudice. Appellant Elvin Farris may file a new motion, but must provide a good reason to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing material in this appeal. See 7th Cir. Rule 25, available at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/rules-procedures/rules/rules.htm#cr25. [ # 5 ] MRO [6] [7280263] [22-3183] (HTP) [Entered: 12/20/2022 09:05 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Elvin Farris to become an electronic filer. [5] [7279590] [22-3183] (CAG) [Entered: 12/15/2022 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Elvin Farris. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7279589] [22-3183] (CAG) [Entered: 12/15/2022 03:13 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: On December 12, 2022, the District Court granted the plaintiffs motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, briefing in this appeal will now proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 01/17/2023 for Elvin Farris. Appellee's brief due on or before 02/16/2023 for Vector Construction. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/09/2023 for Appellant Elvin Farris. [7278731] [22-3183] (PS) [Entered: 12/12/2022 03:05 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order GRANTING leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted:.12/12/2022 [2] [7278684] [22-3183] (CG) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Elvin Farris by 12/12/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 12/19/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/19/2022 for Appellant Elvin Farris [1] [7277414] [22-3183] (AP) [Entered: 12/06/2022 11:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Elvin Farris v. Vector Construction | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ELVIN FARRIS | |
| Represented By: | Elvin Farris |
| Represented By: | Randall D. Schmidt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: VECTOR CONSTRUCTION | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin D. Woodard |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Tews |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
