Ieshuh Griffin v. Milwaukee Election Commission, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: IESHUH GRIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee: MILWAUKEE ELECTION COMMISSION, MILWAUKEE ELECTIONS COMMISSIONERS, CLAIRE WOODALL-VOGG, CAVALIER JOHNSON and ROBERT DONOVAN
Case Number: 22-3266
Filed: December 22, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 3, 2023 Ieshuh Griffin v. Milwaukee Election Commission

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: This appeal is LIMITED to a review of the ordered entered on December 1, 2022, denying appellant Ieshuh Griffins third post-judgment motion. Further, this appeal, as LIMITED by this order, shall proceed to briefing. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/15/2023 for Ieshuh Griffin. (See order for further details.) DW [10] [7289376] [22-3266] (FP) [Entered: 02/06/2023 11:49 AM]
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: Petition for panel rehearing/objection to brief suspending participation of nonarticle III judges. The motion is DENIED. Briefing in this appeal will remain SUSPENDED pending review of the appellants jurisdictional memorandum. [ # 8 ] SCR [9] [7286486] [22-3266] (HTP) [Entered: 01/23/2023 02:37 PM]
January 18, 2023 Filing 8 Pro se motion for panel rehearing/objection to brief suspending* participation of nonarticle III judges filed by Appellant Ieshuh Griffin for court action. [8] [7285547] [22-3266] (KRA) [Entered: 01/18/2023 02:58 PM]
January 18, 2023 Filing 7 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Ieshuh Griffin. [7] [7285543] [22-3266] (KRA) [Entered: 01/18/2023 02:51 PM]
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Request to correct the record. [ # 5 ] The motion is DENIED. A review of the district courts docket shows that no appellee nor attorney for the appellee filed an appearance in the district court before the district court entered its final order and judgment. Because no appellee or counsel for the appellee were served by the district court or made an appearance in that court, there are no appellees involved in this appeal. SCR [6] [7283292] [22-3266] (PS) [Entered: 01/06/2023 04:03 PM]
January 6, 2023 Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ieshuh Griffin to correct the record. [5] [7283223] [22-3266] (LCP) [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:47 PM]
January 5, 2023 Filing 4 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [4] [7283004] [22-3266] (CAG) [Entered: 01/05/2023 03:45 PM]
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Ieshuh Griffin, on or before January 18, 2023, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to a review of the order entered on December 1, 2022, denying appellants third post-judgment motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). [7282824] DW [3] [7282824] [22-3266] (HTP) [Entered: 01/05/2023 10:27 AM]
December 22, 2022 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7281145] [22-3266] (ER) [Entered: 12/23/2022 12:21 PM]
December 22, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 01/05/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/05/2023 for Appellant Ieshuh Griffin [1] [7281143] [22-3266] (ER) [Entered: 12/23/2022 12:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ieshuh Griffin v. Milwaukee Election Commission, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: IESHUH GRIFFIN
Represented By: Ieshuh Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MILWAUKEE ELECTION COMMISSION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MILWAUKEE ELECTIONS COMMISSIONERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CLAIRE WOODALL-VOGG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CAVALIER JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROBERT DONOVAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?