Michael Reynolds v. Eric Williams
| MICHAEL C. REYNOLDS |
| ERIC WILLIAMS |
| 22-3301 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael C. Reynolds under 2241 with 28 U.S.C. 2243 and Rule 81(a), thus hearing must be held within (40) forty days of filing. [11] [7293333] [22-3301] (MAN) [Entered: 02/23/2023 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 10 Prose motion filed by Appellant Michael C. Reynolds to appeal in forma pauperis denial by district court and proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7288100] [22-3301] (LCP) [Entered: 01/31/2023 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Michael C. Reynolds leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 01/13/2023. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/16/2023 for Appellant Michael C. Reynolds. [7285033] [9] [7285033] [22-3301] (CG) [Entered: 01/17/2023 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [8] [7284122] [22-3301] (AP) [Entered: 01/11/2023 12:27 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [7] [7283895] [22-3301] (CG) [Entered: 01/10/2023 02:55 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael C. Reynolds to supplement the original brief. [6] [7283869] [22-3301] (MAN) [Entered: 01/10/2023 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Michael C. Reynolds to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7283868] [22-3301] (MAN) [Entered: 01/10/2023 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Michael C. Reynolds. [4] [7283867] [22-3301] (MAN) [Entered: 01/10/2023 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael C. Reynolds. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7283866] [22-3301] (MAN) [Entered: 01/10/2023 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7281979] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [22-3301] (ER) [Entered: 12/30/2022 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael C. Reynolds by 01/05/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/12/2023 for Appellant Michael C. Reynolds. Transcript information sheet due by 01/12/2023. [1] [7281975] [22-3301] (ER) [Entered: 12/30/2022 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Reynolds v. Eric Williams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL C. REYNOLDS | |
| Represented By: | Michael C. Reynolds |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: ERIC WILLIAMS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
