Micah E. Glenn v. City of Milwaukee, et al
| GLENN INTEREST INVESTMENTS FIRM, LP and MICAH E. GLENN |
| CITY OF MILWAUKEE, TEARMAN SPENCER, HANNAH R. JAHN, DEBORAH MCCOLLUM, AMY TURIM and JANET PROTASIEWICZ |
| 22-3309 |
| December 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed statement by Appellant Micah E. Glenn. [10] [7290605] [22-3309] (PS) [Entered: 02/10/2023 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Micah E. Glenn. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [9] [7288871] [22-3309] (PS) [Entered: 02/02/2023 03:22 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: On consideration of the paper captioned Statement filed by appellant Micah Glenn on January 18, 2023, in which he advises the court that plaintiff Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP should be dismissed as an appellant, plaintiff Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP be removed as an appellant from this appeal. The appeal shall proceed with Micah Glenn as the sole appellant. DW [7285801] [22-3309] (CG) [Entered: 01/19/2023 12:43 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Micah E. Glenn leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 01/18/2023. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/17/2023 for Appellants Micah E. Glenn and Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP [7285577] [7] [7285577] [22-3309] (AP) [Entered: 01/18/2023 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Micah E. Glenn statement in response to the court's January 3, 2023 order. (Forwarded from the District Court) [6] [7285455] [22-3309] (PS) [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis was filed on 1/17/2023 and is currently pending. [5] [7285435] [22-3309] (JR) [Entered: 01/18/2023 11:46 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellants Micah E. Glenn and Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellants Micah E. Glenn and Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP by 01/31/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7854 9733. [4] [7285001] [22-3309] (AD) [Entered: 01/17/2023 09:03 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the notice of appeal states that plaintiffs Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP and Micah E. Glenn appeal the final decision in this case. A Limited Partnership however, is legally incapable of appearing in federal court unless represented by an attorney. See United States v. Hagerman, 545, F.3d 579, 581-82 (7th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, plaintiff Micah E. Glenn shall file, on or before January 17, 2023, a statement advising the court whether he is a licensed attorney. If not, and if no attorney will be representing plaintiff Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP in this appeal. Plaintiff Glenn interest Investments Firm, LP will be dismissed as an appellant. [7282318] [3] [7282318] [22-3309] (AD) [Entered: 01/03/2023 03:19 PM]
|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7282160] [22-3309] (PS) [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Micah E. Glenn and Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP by 01/06/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 01/13/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/13/2023 for Appellants Micah E. Glenn and Glenn Interest Investments Firm, LP. [1] [7282151] [22-3309] (PS) [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
