Matthew Sullivan v. Daniel Sproul
Petitioner / Appellant: MATTHEW SULLIVAN
Respondent / Appellee: DANIEL SPROUL
Case Number: 23-1133
Filed: January 19, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2023 Filing 9 Filed Notice of Intent to Enforce Plea Waiver by Appellee Daniel Sproul. [9] [7298094] [23-1133] (Reed, Peter) [Entered: 03/17/2023 09:23 AM]
February 22, 2023 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Matthew Sullivan for reconsideration of denial of in forma pauperis. (Forwarded from the District Court per 02/22/2023 District Court order). [8] [7292944] [23-1133] (CAG) [Entered: 02/22/2023 04:10 PM]
February 22, 2023 Filing 7 Filed District Court order dated 02/22/2023, The Court DENIES Sullivan's second motion for reconsideration and TRANSFERS the portion of his motion seeking leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis to the Court of Appeals for consideration in connection with Appeal No. 23-1133. Forwarded to SCR. [7] [7292942] [23-1133] (CAG) [Entered: 02/22/2023 04:08 PM]
February 9, 2023 Filing 6 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Matthew Sullivan leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/08/2023. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/13/2023 for Appellant Matthew Sullivan [7290129] [6] [7290129] [23-1133] (AP) [Entered: 02/09/2023 08:57 AM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 5 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [5] [7289533] [23-1133] (AP) [Entered: 02/06/2023 04:13 PM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Matthew Sullivan. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-1505 (Forwarded from the District Court).[4] [7289497] [23-1133] (CAG) [Entered: 02/06/2023 03:36 PM]
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Matthew Sullivan is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Matthew Sullivan by 02/17/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 7195. [3] [7288954] [23-1133] (AD) [Entered: 02/03/2023 08:42 AM]
February 3, 2023 Filing 2 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Matthew Sullivan. [2] [7288952] [23-1133] (AD) [Entered: 02/03/2023 08:40 AM]
January 19, 2023 Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Matthew Sullivan by 01/26/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/02/2023 for Appellant Matthew Sullivan. Transcript information sheet due by 02/02/2023. [1] [7286125] [23-1133] (ER) [Entered: 01/20/2023 12:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthew Sullivan v. Daniel Sproul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MATTHEW SULLIVAN
Represented By: Matthew Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DANIEL SPROUL
Represented By: Peter Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?