Jonathan Judkins v. W. Spiller, et al
| JONATHAN JUDKINS |
| W. SPILLER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WALKER, SERGEANT HART, LIEUTENANT BROOKMAN and LIEUTENANT SCHOENBEDK |
| 23-1202 |
| February 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: On consideration of the paper filed by appellant on March 16, 2023, this appeal shall proceed to briefing. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/01/2023 for Jonathan Judkins. (See order for further details). DW [7298708] [23-1202] (HTP) [Entered: 03/21/2023 09:02 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by pro se Appellant Jonathan Judkins. motion filed by Appellant Jonathan Judkins to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [7] [7297962] [23-1202]--[Edited 03/17/2023 by CMD to update text.] (CAG) [Entered: 03/16/2023 03:31 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant, on or before March 16, 2023, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. If appellant wishes to request an extension of time in which to file the notice of appeal, he should file an appropriate motion in the district court, not this court, as soon as possible. Appellants jurisdictional memorandum should include a discussion of the status of any such motion. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, appellant Jonathan Judkins must inform the court both whether the prison has a system designed for legal mail and whether he used it to file his notice of appeal. Additionally, appellant Jonathan Judkins must provide a notarized statement or a declaration under penalty of perjury (in compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746) setting forth the date the notice of appeal was deposited in the prisons internal mail system and stating whether first class postage was prepaid. See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c). Appellants notarized statement or declaration shall be filed on or before March 16, 2023. (See order for further details). DW [6] [6] [7294858] [23-1202] (HTP) [Entered: 03/02/2023 03:41 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed notice from the District Court that the $505.00 appellate fee was received. [5][7294367] [23-1202] (CAG) [Entered: 03/01/2023 08:47 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Check in the amount of $505.00. The clerk of this court shall send the CHECK to the clerk of the district court. [4] [7292933] CC [23-1202] (LCP) [Entered: 02/22/2023 04:01 PM]
|
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7288738] [23-1202] (HTP) [Entered: 02/02/2023 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Kelly Pierce, J. Lashbrook, and F. Lawrence. [2] [7288737] [23-1202] (HTP) [Entered: 02/02/2023 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jonathan Judkins by 02/09/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/06/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 02/16/2023. [1] [7288732] [23-1202] (HTP) [Entered: 02/02/2023 11:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
