USA v. Michael King
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
MICHAEL D. KING |
23-1256 |
February 10, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed status report and transcript information sheet by Appellant Michael D. King. [7] [7292444] [23-1256] (Flees, Joseph) [Entered: 02/21/2023 10:52 AM] |
Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael D. King. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 20-2354; 21-1226 [6] [7292186] [23-1256] (Flees, Joseph) [Entered: 02/17/2023 03:49 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant, on or before February 28, 2023, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed because it is untimely. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. If appellant wishes to request an extension of time in which to file the notice of appeal, defendant-appellant Michael King should file an appropriate motion in the district court, not this court, as soon as possible. Appellant's jurisdictional memorandum should include a discussion of the status of any such motion. (See order for further details) DW [7291316] [5] [7291316] [23-1256] (PS) [Entered: 02/14/2023 04:31 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, SUSPENDS briefing in this appeal pending a ruling on counsels motion to withdraw. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney Joseph W. Flees, II comply with the provisions of Fed. R. App. 10(b) regarding the preparation of the transcripts of the revocation hearing. Attorney Joseph W. Flees, II must file a Status Report regarding his compliance with this order no later than February 21, 2023. Attorney Joseph W. Flees, II is further directed to attach a copy of the Transcript Information Sheet submitted to the court reporter to his Status Report, signed by the court reporter, and indicating the date the transcripts are expected to be completed [7291305] DW. [4] [7291305] [23-1256] (AP) [Entered: 02/14/2023 04:01 PM] |
Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney William Coonan for Appellee USA. [3] [7291162] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-1256] [Edited 02/14/2023 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Coonan, William) [Entered: 02/14/2023 11:58 AM] |
Filing 2 Attorney Motion filed by Joseph Flees for Appellant Michael D. King to withdraw as counsel [2] [7290840] [23-1256]--[Edited 02/13/2023 by AP- to reflect attorney motion filed] (Flees, Joseph) [Entered: 02/13/2023 12:40 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Transcript information sheet due by 02/24/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael D. King by 02/17/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/22/2023 for Michael D. King. [1] [7290809] [23-1256] (FP) [Entered: 02/13/2023 11:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Michael King | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Angela Scott |
Represented By: | William E. Coonan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: MICHAEL D. KING | |
Represented By: | Joseph W. Flees II |
Represented By: | Michael D. King |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.