Tamica J. Smithson v. Lloyd J. Austin, III
TAMICA J. SMITHSON |
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, United States Secretary of Defense |
23-1306 |
February 16, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Tamica J. Smithson v. Lloyd J. Austin, III |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 7 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 05/05/2023 for Tamica J. Smithson. Appellee's brief due on or before 06/05/2023 for Lloyd J. Austin III. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/26/2023 for Appellant Tamica J. Smithson. CDH [8] [7301670] [23-1306] (CG) [Entered: 04/04/2023 08:49 AM] |
Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tamica J. Smithson for extension of time to file appellant's brief. [7] [7301448] [23-1306] (JR) [Entered: 04/03/2023 01:51 PM] |
Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Tamica J. Smithson. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2566 [6] [7296343] [23-1306] (LCP) [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:24 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/06/2023 for Tamica J. Smithson. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/08/2023 for Lloyd J. Austin III. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/30/2023 for Appellant Tamica J. Smithson [5] [7295594] [23-1306] (CAG) [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:23 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [4] [7295593] [23-1306] (CAG) [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:21 AM] |
Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Tamica J. Smithson. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2566 [3] [7295585] [23-1306] (JR) [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:05 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Tamica J. Smithson is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Tamica J. Smithson by 03/17/2023. [2] [7294960] [23-1306]--[Edited 03/03/2023 by AD to remove cert mail text.] (AD) [Entered: 03/03/2023 09:37 AM] |
Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 03/02/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Tamica J. Smithson by 02/23/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/02/2023 for Appellant Tamica J. Smithson. [1] [7292166] [23-1306]--[Edited 02/17/2023 by VG - replaced forms to reflect correct district court number] (AD) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Tamica J. Smithson v. Lloyd J. Austin, III | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: TAMICA J. SMITHSON | |
Represented By: | Tamica J. Smithson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, United States Secretary of Defense | |
Represented By: | Rachana N. Fischer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.