Richard Sharif v. Jacqueline Cox, et al
| RICHARD SHARIF |
| JACQUELINE P. COX, SARAH O. SCHRUP, individually and as President of the Circuit Executive Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit, and CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT |
| 23-1324 |
| February 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant Richard Sharif is directed to showcause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). GW. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant Richard Sharif by 05/02/2023. [5] [7304751] [23-1324] (GW) [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:42 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/07/2023 for Richard Sharif. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/08/2023 for Jacqueline P. Cox. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/30/2023 for Appellant Richard Sharif [4] [7295954] [23-1324] (CAG) [Entered: 03/08/2023 11:55 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [3] [7295953] [23-1324] (CAG) [Entered: 03/08/2023 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellees Circuit Executive Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit and Sarah Schrup, per District Court docket and information sheet. [2] [7292904] [23-1324] (FP) [Entered: 02/22/2023 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 03/07/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/07/2023 for Appellant Richard Sharif. [1] [7292872] [23-1324] (FP) [Entered: 02/22/2023 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Richard Sharif v. Jacqueline Cox, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD SHARIF | |
| Represented By: | Richard Sharif |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JACQUELINE P. COX | |
| Represented By: | Thomas P. Walsh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: SARAH O. SCHRUP, individually and as President of the Circuit Executive Judicial Council of the Seventh Circuit, | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
