Israel Ramos v. David Mitchell
Petitioner / Appellant: ISRAEL RAMOS, also known as GREGORY HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID MITCHELL
Case Number: 23-1365
Filed: February 24, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2023 Filing 8 Filed District Court order. Petitioner/Appellant Hernandez's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dckt. No. [39]) is hereby granted as follows. Hernandez has $3,365.53 in his account, and he has received an average monthly deposit of $405.70 in the last six months. Hernandez has received a steady stream of funds, and it has accumulated. Hernandez must pay $150 per month until the filing fee is paid. The first payment is due by May 12, 2023. [8] [7304736] [23-1365] (AP) [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:16 PM]
April 17, 2023 Filing 7 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [7] [7304265] [23-1365] (CG) [Entered: 04/17/2023 11:54 AM]
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [6] [7303718] [23-1365] (CG) [Entered: 04/13/2023 02:24 PM]
April 13, 2023 Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Israel Ramos to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7303653] [23-1365] (CAG) [Entered: 04/13/2023 01:21 PM]
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re: Motion for extension of time for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and filing fee. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by April 13, 2023. [ # 3 ] CDH [4] [7297219] [23-1365] (HTP) [Entered: 03/14/2023 10:32 AM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Israel Ramos for extension of time for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and filing fee. [3] [7297040] [23-1365] (LCP) [Entered: 03/13/2023 03:31 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 2 Filed District Court order dated 03/08/2023, Petitioner's renewed request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Forwarded to SCR & MPB. [2] [7296111] [23-1365] (CAG) [Entered: 03/09/2023 08:16 AM]
February 24, 2023 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 01/30/2023. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/10/2023 for Appellant Israel Ramos. Transcript information sheet due by 03/10/2023. [1] [7293875] [23-1365] (AP) [Entered: 02/27/2023 02:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Israel Ramos v. David Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ISRAEL RAMOS, also known as GREGORY HERNANDEZ
Represented By: Israel Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID MITCHELL
Represented By: Katherine M. Doersch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?