James Walker v. K. Allsup, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee: K. ALLSUP, V. WOOD, ROBIN ROWALD, BETSY SPILLER and B. BRAMLET
Case Number: 23-1398
Filed: March 2, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 17, 2023 James Walker v. K. Allsup

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2023 Filing 9 IT IS ORDERED that Appellant James E. Walker show cause as to why this cause should not be DISMISSED for failure to tender the $4.08 initial partial filing fee as directed in the district court's 03/06/2023 order. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant James E. Walker by 05/10/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 2280 0001 7855 0326. [9] [7306335] [23-1398] (MLM) [Entered: 04/26/2023 10:59 AM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant James E. Walker in 23-1398 for appointment of counsel. [8] [7304044] [23-1398, 23-1411] (CAG) [Entered: 04/14/2023 01:42 PM]
March 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: Notice of error, filedon 3/22/2023. On March 2, 2023, the appellant filed a notice of appeal from the district court's judgment, and appeal no. 23-1398 was opened. On March 3, 2023, the appellant filed a second almost-identical notice of appeal and a second appeal, 23-1411, was opened. Both filings seek to challenge the same district court judgment, and two separate appeals are not necessary. Accordingly, appeal no. 23-1411 is administratively CLOSED. No appellate filing fees for appeal no. 23-1411 shall be imposed. [7] [7299549] SCR [23-1398, 23-1411] (FP) [Entered: 03/24/2023 09:12 AM]
March 22, 2023 Filing 6 Filed notice of error by Appellant James E. Walker in 23-1398, 23-1411. [6] [7299134] [23-1398, 23-1411] (CAG) [Entered: 03/22/2023 01:44 PM]
March 16, 2023 Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant James E. Walker leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 03/06/2023. District Court has assessed a $4.08 initial partial filing fee. [5] [7297996] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 04/17/2023. [23-1398] (CAG) [Entered: 03/16/2023 04:18 PM]
March 16, 2023 Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant James E. Walker to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7297952] [23-1398] (LCP) [Entered: 03/16/2023 03:15 PM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7295003] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [23-1398] (CG) [Entered: 03/03/2023 11:12 AM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Jennifer Clendenin, Sean P. Smolak, Douglas J. Osinga, C/O Rhoades, Jeric Burns, Christop Wehrenberg, Michael M. Jones, Joel B. Slavens, Genel T. Bailey, Jenet Cook, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, and Lisa Qualls. [2] [7295000] [23-1398] (CG) [Entered: 03/03/2023 11:11 AM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant James E. Walker by 03/09/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 03/16/2023. [1] [7294992] [23-1398] (CG) [Entered: 03/03/2023 10:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Walker v. K. Allsup, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES E. WALKER
Represented By: James E. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: K. ALLSUP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: V. WOOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROBIN ROWALD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BETSY SPILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: B. BRAMLET
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?